Access Millions of academic & study documents

Hume and induction doc

Content type
User Generated
Showing Page:
1/3
HUME AND INDUCTION 1
Hume and Induction
Name
Institution

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/3
HUME AND INDUCTION 2
David Hume was a critic of induction. The critics of David Hume in induction are seen
through thinking and concluding what we never observed. Hume, in his position, doesn't believe
how people think and draw conclusions from past inferences (Hume, 2019). According to Hume,
people should think and conclude from evidence of recent happenings which people have firsthand
information about. Hume's critics in the problem of induction are to understand the foundation of
the conclusions people make. According to Hume, the ideas we have are formed from impressions.
The big ideas we develop in our brain are formed from merging simple ideas of the brain. Hume
argues about the formation of inferences. Inferences, according to Hume, should be developed
from the association of past and current experiences. One should not rely entirely on past
inferences.
Paul Feyerabend was given a name as an anti-science philosopher from the critics he made
on science's philosophy. Paul, in his life, defended relativism in the field of politics and also
epistemologically. Paul criticized science's philosophy in saying there is nothing to be chosen from
the scientific view and the astrology view (Feyerabend, 2019). Paul criticizes science because he
feels science is significantly anarchistic. According to Paul, science has many myths. Although it
tries to gather truth about claims, it goes beyond the actual potential. Paul tries to think differently
from the other philosophers. He does not support the philosophy of science like the other scientists.
According to Paul, anything can be used to change Africa. Paul's argument shows how western
philosophies should not be used to shape Africa. Africa, as a continent, should be able to use her
scientific views in her development. In his anarchistic view, Paul criticizes the view of science
being considered to run according to rules. Paul was against scientific views which use firm
principles. Paul made discoveries about the fixed scientific methodologies. He argues about fixed
methodologies as having limitations on man's development

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/3

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
HUME AND INDUCTION 1 Hume and Induction Name Institution HUME AND INDUCTION 2 David Hume was a critic of induction. The critics of David Hume in induction are seen through thinking and concluding what we never observed. Hume, in his position, doesn't believe how people think and draw conclusions from past inferences (Hume, 2019). According to Hume, people should think and conclude from evidence of recent happenings which people have firsthand information about. Hume's critics in the problem of induction are to understand the foundation of the conclusions people make. According to Hume, the ideas we have are formed from impressions. The big ideas we develop in our brain are formed from merging simple ideas of the brain. Hume argues about the formation of inferences. Inferences, according to Hume, should be developed from the association of past and current experiences. One should not ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4