Access over 35 million academic & study documents

Ethical Theories 6

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Philosophy
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/1
Discussion Post #6
Mill proposed a utilitarian calculus to assess the nature of human pleasure and pain. He
expands on it by opposing the quantitative distinction, in which there are two cases to consider:
higher and lower pleasure (superior or inferior). When it comes to qualitative differentiation, he
believes that everyone recognizes that certain types of pleasure are more desired and valuable than
others.
In the first situation, the medical intake person will pick "the parent and sole breadwinner
of two young children" by using the quantitative distinction that among the offered options, he/she
has the most substantial and greater duty on the following. This individual has two young children
to care for, but the 55-year-old may be alone in life and does not assist others, and the 22-year-old
college student does not provide major support to anyone, just giving a tiny contribution to its
family. In terms of qualitative differentiation, the father or mother of two young children would
still be the most outstanding since his/her role was more significant than the other person who also
required a ventilator and hospital care. Assessing the incident, if the Parent does not obtain the
necessary hospital care, it is more likely that his or her condition will deteriorate, causing him or
her to fail to complete its work and stop providing for the needs of its spouse. If this occurs, the
kids will be abandoned and may suffer from hunger or other problems as a result of not having
someone to care for them.
In the second case, Max, the son, is the one who needs to go to the local store to get the
weekly groceries. This is lawfully acceptable by applying the utilitarian calculus, in which by
assessing the qualitative contrast, everyone can see that, although having severe asthma, his health
was better than his father's, who is quite elderly. Furthermore, because of his age, his immune
system was stronger than his father's, and his bodily resistance was likely significantly superior to
his father, who was at a greater danger of contracting the virus and dying as a result. Hence,
analyzing the quantitative situation, Max's percentage of catching the virus is much lower than his
father's, and based on age evaluation, the father's age is no longer compatible with going outdoors
as he is already a senior citizen. Besides, Max, who is 30 years old, is permitted to walk outdoors
to purchase a necessary item during the epidemic. The government imposes specific restrictions
under which some people are only needed to undertake the quarantine because of their age or
health state. As a result, if Robert goes outdoors, he is more likely to be penalized for breaking the
rules. This is a critical issue that must be carefully considered, especially because they are
experiencing a financial crisis merely to deliver their goods.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Discussion Post #6 Mill proposed a utilitarian calculus to assess the nature of human pleasure and pain. He expands on it by opposing the quantitative distinction, in which there are two cases to consider: higher and lower pleasure (superior or inferior). When it comes to qualitative differentiation ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents