Access Millions of academic & study documents

367901 CMAC vs Mc intosh

Content type
User Generated
Showing Page:
1/6

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/6

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/6

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 6 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Curpod et al. Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology: 25(1):25-30(2017) DOI: 10.4038 /slja.v25i1.8195 Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with laryngeal mask airway pro-seal in elective surgery in adults SG Curpod1*, S Basavalingaiah2 Associate Professor of Anaesthesia1, Junior Resident2, ESIC – Medical College and PGIMSR, Karnataka, India. Corresponding author: prasad_cgs@yahoo.co.in Aim: The present study was performed to compare the clinical performance of i-gel and PLMA in terms of the efficacy and safety management in anaesthetized adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Materials and Methods: 80 patients of either sex were randomized in two groups. Group I (n=40) for i-gel and Group P (n=40) for Proseal. After induction i-gel or Proseal was inserted. The cuff of PLMA inflated and pressure maintained at 60cmH2O. Insertion time, ease and number of attempts at insertion, airway sealing pressure, airway sealing quality score (ASQS), fiberoptic assessment, ease and number of attempts at gastric tube placement and complications during insertion, maintenance and removal were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 20, the sample size was calculated with 99% power (β error = 1%), 95% confidence(α error = 5%), p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Demographic data were comparable. Mean insertion time for i-gel (12.30± 1.018sec) was significantly lower than PLMA (13.82 ± 1.083sec):(p< 0.00), ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4