Showing Page:
1/4
Respectful maternity Care:
A scoping Review Protocol;
11.2 Development of a scoping review protocol
11.2.1 Title and author information
11.2.2 Developing the title and question
11.2.3 Introduction
11.2.4 Inclusion criteria
11.2.5 Search Strategy:
11.2.6 Study selection:
11.2.7 Data extraction:
11.2.8 Presentation of the results
https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/7/10/e017468.full.pdf
http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA-ScR-Fillable-Checklist_11Sept2019.pdf
overview
The topic is about respectful maternity care at facility based at intrapartum. The client was
asked before the start of scoping review to write a protocol for this.
The question for the scoping review is
What are the components of respectful abuse disrespect maternity care?
Or what are the classification of respectful maternity care or the criteria of respectful
matneity care ?
The client is doing a scoping review because she want to understand the topic and to
synthesis the evidence that talking about components review to identify the gaps. The
client’s particular interest is to develop an in-depth understanding of the problem of D&A -
mapping the evidence
The sub questions for the topic are
Showing Page:
2/4
What are the similarities and difference between the components of respectful
care?
-What are the criteria of the respectful maternity care ?
-Are the definition has changed over the time ?
You can write the purpose of the scoping review
To identify the gaps to identity the evidence to know about the topic
]
Inclusion criteria:
PCC very important to write it
TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS
CONCEPT
CONTEXT
‘maternal
healthcare
services’
disrespect*
‘pregnant
women’
‘facility-based
care’
‘disrespect and
abuse’
Delivery
'skilled
birth attendan*'
abus*
labo?r
‘childbirth care’
ill treatment
childbirth
‘facility delivery’
maltreatment
Birth
‘institutional
delivery’
mistreatment
hospital*
neglect
'maternity
ward*'
‘staff attitude’
'skilled care'
bullying
'health facilities'
‘dehumani?ed care’
Showing Page:
3/4
violence
‘undignified care’
cruelty
abandonment
https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/7/10/e017468.full.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947716/pdf/bmjopen-2016-012058.pdf
http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA-ScR-Fillable-
Checklist_11Sept2019.pdf
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-
Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)
Checklist
1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping
Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist SECTION ITEM PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM
www.prisma-statement.org
Open Access Protocol A scoping review protocol on the roles
and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process
in biomedical journals
glontik, etal Open 2177:e1746 doi:11136bmopen2171746 1 Open Access AbstrAct Introduction
The primary functions of peer reviewers are poorly defined. Thus far no body of literature has
systematically identified the roles and tasks of peer
bmjopen.bmj.com
Showing Page:
4/4
Search will be in various health-related databases such as MEDLINE(Ovid),
CINAHL, Cochrane Library & MAGONLINE Library as these contain bibliographic
references to thousands of health-related articles.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Respectful maternity Care: A scoping Review Protocol; • • • • • • • • • 11.2 Development of a scoping review protocol 11.2.1 Title and author information 11.2.2 Developing the title and question 11.2.3 Introduction 11.2.4 Inclusion criteria 11.2.5 Search Strategy: 11.2.6 Study selection: 11.2.7 Data extraction: 11.2.8 Presentation of the results https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/7/10/e017468.full.pdf http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA-ScR-Fillable-Checklist_11Sept2019.pdf overview The topic is about respectful maternity care at facility based at intrapartum. The client was asked before the start of scoping review to write a protocol for this. The question for the scoping review is What are the components of respectful – abuse disrespect maternity care? Or what are the classification of respectful maternity care or the criteria of respectful matneity care ? The client is doing a scoping review because she want to understand the topic and to synthesis the evidence that talking about components review to identify the gaps. The client’s particular interest is to develop an in-depth understanding of the problem of D&A mapping the evidence The sub questions for the topic are What are the similarities and difference between the components of respectful care? -What are the criteria of the respectful maternity care ? -Are the definition has changed over the time ? You can write the purpose of the scoping review To identify the gaps to identity the evidence to know about the topic ] Inclusion criteria: PCC very important to write it TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS CONCEPT CONTEXT ‘maternal healthcare services’ disrespect* ‘pregnant women’ ‘facility-based care’ ‘disrespect and abuse’ Delivery abus* 'skilled birth attendan*' labo?r ‘childbirth care’ ill treatment childbirth ‘facility delivery’ maltreatment Birth ‘institutional delivery’ mistreatment hospital* neglect 'maternity ward*' ‘staff attitude’ 'skilled care' bullying 'health facilities' ‘dehumani?ed care’ violence ‘undignified care’ cruelty abandonment https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/7/10/e017468.full.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947716/pdf/bmjopen-2016-012058.pdf http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA-ScR-FillableChecklist_11Sept2019.pdf Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist SECTION ITEM PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM www.prisma-statement.org Open Access Protocol A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals glontik, etal Open 2177:e1746 doi:11136bmopen2171746 1 Open Access AbstrAct Introduction The primary functions of peer reviewers are poorly defined. Thus far no body of literature has systematically identified the roles and tasks of peer bmjopen.bmj.com Search will be in various health-related databases such as MEDLINE(Ovid), CINAHL, Cochrane Library & MAGONLINE Library as these contain bibliographic references to thousands of health-related articles. Name: Description: ...
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4