For this first part of the assignment, write a 1-page paper outlining the reasons you selected this director. Share in at least one paragraph why you selected this director and the reasons you have for your interest in his or her work. In at least one paragraph, write a brief biography about the director. In the biography provide background information about the director’s work in cinema—information that may have shaped the director outside of cinema can be incorporated as long as it is relevant to his or her film career. List three of the director’s films that you intend to discuss in your project. Include a description of how these films are relevant and how they express the meaning of the director’s work. Briefly describe the subjects, themes, and styles of the director’s work. Your description needs to be at least one paragraph and should include how these features impact the director’s films. Provide examples from the director’s work and career. Below is a description of each of these features: Subjects: Genres (categories) such as sci-fi, comedy, drama, film noir, suspense, action and adventure, or horrorThemes: Messages such as social awareness, love, conflict, dystopian future, redemption, innocence, vengeance, justice, sacrifice, transformation, resurrection, good versus evil, coming of age, underdog, man versus nature, man versus society, etc.Style: Camera style/angles and lighting (cinematography), Editing, Mise-en-scène (staging), Sound, Acting

Write a two page paper analyzing the fact pattern presented below.  Please use federal law or your own state law.  Your analysis should include application of the topics covered during the past seven weeks.  For example, search and seizure, search warrants, execution of warrants, exceptions to the warrant requirement, exclusionary rule, Miranda rights, and the right against self-incrimination.  Do not restate the facts in your paper, but rather identify the issues, analyze, and provide your legal reasoning. Ensure your citations are in APA or Bluebook format. Please see the grading rubric, which will be used to grade this assignment. Chris is a police officer with the local Centerville Police Department.  She is in plain clothes and knocked on the front door of Steve’s house and asked if she could enter to enforce a valid warrant.  The warrant was a search warrant issued by Judge Wells from the Centerville District Court.  Judge Wells is a retired state police trooper from the state police barracks in Centerville.  The warrant indicated that "the first floor of Steve's house will be searched for a gun used in connection with a robbery and jewelry, which was stolen."  While searching the first floor of Steve's house, Officer Chris smelled what she thought was gun powder emanating from the second floor.  Officer Chris immediately walked upstairs and found a gun at the tops of the stairs.  She went to confiscate the gun and while doing so noticed a note attached to the gun with an address on it.  The address was a known location for stolen jewelry to be pawned.  During the search, Steve told Officer Chris that, "I do not know what you are here for, because I did not rob Grubb's jewelry store."  Officer Chris asked Steve to go to the police station and Steve agreed.  As they walked into the police station, Judge Wells yelled, "is that the person who robbed Grubb's jewelry store?"  Steve replied, "I told Officer Chris already, I did not rob Grubb's jewelry store."

Learn by DoingThis activity gives you practice explaining the different parts of the StatCrunch print-out for a hypothesis test for a population mean. You will review the meaning of standard error, T-scores and the P-value.Some features of this activity may not work well on a cell phone or tablet. We highly recommend that you complete this activity on a computer.Here are the directions, grading rubric, and definition of high-quality feedback for the discussion board exercises. A list of StatCrunch directions is provided at the bottom of this page.PromptIn a previous lab we tested the following hypotheses, H 0 : μ = 4.73 and H a : μ < 4.73 (where μ is the mean number of alcoholic drinks consumed by students at a liberal arts college).In a random sample of 75 students, the mean was 3.93 alcoholic drinks consumed in a week. Here is the StatCrunch output from the hypothesis test. μ : Mean of variable H 0 : μ = 4.73 H A : μ ≠ 4.73 Hypothesis test results Variable Sample Mean Std. Err. DF T-Stat P-value number of drinks per week 3.9333333 0.43592434 74 -1.8275343 0.0717 Using this context and the StatCrunch output, explain the meaning of each of the following. Std. Err (standard error)T-stat (T-score)P-value In a previous matched pairs lab we tested the following hypotheses, where μ is the mean of the differences in corn yield for a plot of land (regular seed minus kiln-dried): H0: µ = 0 and Ha: µ < 0. In a random sample of 11 seeds of each type, the mean of the differences in the sample was -33.7. Here is a StatCrunch print-out of the hypothesis test.Paired T hypothesis test: μ D = μ 1 − μ 2 : Mean of the difference between Regular seed and Kiln-dried seed H 0 : μ D = 0 H A : μ D < 0 Hypothesis test results Difference Mean Std. Err. DF T-Stat P-value Regular seed - Kiln-dried seed -33.727273 19.951346 10 -1.6904761 0.0609 Differences stored in column, Differences.Using this context and the StatCrunch output, explain the meaning of each of the following. Std. Err (standard error)T-stat (T-score)P-value.