LEARN MORE...

Home
Documents
June 2021
2
Patho wk 4 Rubric

Patho wk 4 Rubric

Content type

User Generated

Uploaded By

funzf1981

Pages

Showing Page:

1/2

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Application_Rubric

Exit

• Grid View

• List View

Excellent

Good

Quality of Work Submitted:

The extent of which work meets the

assigned criteria and work reflects

graduate level critical and analytic

thinking.

27 (27%) - 30 (30%)

Assignment exceeds expectations.

All topics are addressed with a

minimum of 75%

containing exceptional breadth and

depth about each of the assignment

topics.

24 (24%) - 26 (26%)

Assignment meets expectations. All

topics are addressed with a

minimum of 50%

containing goodbreadth and depth

about each of the assignment

topics.

Assignment meets most of the

expectations. One required topic is

either not addressed or

inadequately addressed.

Assignment superficially meets

some of the expectations. Two or

more required topics are either not

addressed or inadequately

addressed.

Quality of Work Submitted:

The purpose of the paper is clear.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

A clear and comprehensive purpose

statement is provided which

delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Purpose of the assignment is

stated, yet is brief and not

descriptive.

Purpose of the assignment is vague

or off topic.

No purpose statement was

provided.

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

The extend to which the work

reflects the student's ability to:

Understand and interpret the

assignment's key concepts.

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Demonstrates the ability to critically

appraise and intellectually explore

key concepts.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

Demonstrates a clear understanding

of key concepts.

Shows some degree of

understanding of key concepts.

Shows a lack of understanding of

key concepts, deviates from topics.

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

The extend to which the work

reflects the student's ability to:

Apply and integrate material in

course resources (i.e. video,

required readings, and textbook)

and credible outside resources.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

Demonstrates and applies

exceptional support of major points

and integrates 2 or more credible

outside sources, in addition to 2-3

course resources to suppport point

of view.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Integrates specific information from

1 credible outside resource and 2-3

course resources to support major

points and point of view.

Minimally includes and integrates

specific information from 2-3

resources to support major points

and point of view.

Includes and integrates specific

information from 0 to 1 resoruce to

support major points and point of

view.

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

The extend to which the work

reflects the student's ability to:

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

Synthesizes and justifies (defends,

explains, validates, confirms)

information gleaned from sources to

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Summarizes information gleaned

from sources to support major

points, but does not synthesize.

Identifies but does not interpret or

apply concepts, and/or strategies

Rarely or does not interpret, apply,

and synthesize concepts, and/or

strategies.

Showing Page:

2/2

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Name: NURS_6501_Week4_Application_Rubric Exit • • Grid View List View Excellent Good Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. 27 (27%) - 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. 24 (24%) - 26 (26%) Assignment meets e topics are addresse minimum of 50% containing goodbrea about each o ...
Purchase document to see full attachment