Access over 20 million homework & study documents

search

West Virginia University Infractions Review

Content type
User Generated
Rating
Showing Page:
1/3
Running head: WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS REVIEW 1
West Virginia University Infractions Review
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/3
IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 2
West Virginia University Infractions Review
All legal resolutions passed should be clear and concise to enable for their future
applications. Basically, in the decision following the review of West Virginia University, the
language used is not sufficient enough to create a measurable outcome that can be used in future
cases. In brief, the report is vague as it did not state if West Virginia University gained enough
recruiting advantage. Consequently, the report’s argument fails to offer a clear spelt out
threshold on what is ‘minimal’ or ‘substantial’ in its admission. Therefore, this leaves some
degree of vagueness in the determination of the advantages that the university experienced.
Since the violations were described as a violation of NCAA Level II and Level III
guidelines as they occurred before and after 30
th
October 2010, a clear report should have been
issued to act as a guide for similar cases in future (NCAA, 2015). Notably, suppose another case
presented itself after this ruling; what will be the judgement? Definitely, this will call for another
set of ruling and the West Virginia University will not be used as a benchmark. Additionally, the
instruction for the two-year probation to any student-athletes on paid visit does not have any
impact on those who were considered by clubs after the initial contact from the university.
Accordingly, this appears to be a biased ruling. Moreover, the claim by coaches to either being
ignorant of the NCAA legislation is not a justified avenue to have a lessened penalty.
Noteworthy, ignorance is never a defence.
In conclusion, the language used in the ruling is not authoritative enough to command the
strictness needed to set a precedent for future cases. Importantly, the ruling appears to be
sympathetic to the offender. Consequently, it is important that this ruling should be reviewed to
establish more deterrent measures for similar offences.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/3

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running head: WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY INFRACTIONS REVIEW West Virginia University Infractions Review Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation 1 IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 2 West Virginia University Infractions Review All legal resolutions passed should be clear and concise to enable for their future applications. Basically, in the decision following the review of West Virginia University, the language used is not sufficient enough to create a measurable outcome that can be used in future cases. In brief, the report is vague as it did not state if West Virginia University gained enough recruiting advantage. Consequently, the report’s argument fails to offer a clear spelt out threshold on what is ‘minimal’ or ‘substantial’ in its admission. Therefore, this leaves some degree of vagueness in the determination of the advantages that the university expe ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4