No directly quoted material may be used in this project paper. Resources should be summarized or paraphrased with appropriate in-text and resource page citations.Produce a sequential timeline beginning with the 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act and end at today's date. You may use a chart or other visual representation to demonstrate understanding. Next, identify at least two major policy statements or legislation that had significant effects on the enforcement of drug laws in the United States. The narrative portion of the project should be at least two full pages of text (or more if necessary to demonstrate your understanding of the topic); not including your reference page and any visual representation. The narrative must also contain:a detailed description of the eventan assessment of its impact on drug and/or alcohol controlpublic attitudes/responses to the eventRubric Name: A MODEL Rubric for CCJS Projects - Max pointsCriteriaEquivalent to an AEquivalent to a BEquivalent to a CEquivalent to a D or FOverall content of paper or project. Value: 20 points20 pointsThe paper is exemplary. Content of the paper exceeds all information required by assignment, demonstrates critical thinking skills, sophisticated analysis and other perspectives. Points available: 18-2017.9 pointsPaper indicates effort above and beyond the Project Description in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, etc. Points available: 16-17.915.9 pointsIn general, the content of the paper addresses the information required by the assignment.Points available: 14-15.913.9 pointsThe overall content of the paper addresses less than the minimal amount of the information required by the assignment. It demonstrates marginal work and does not reflect an understanding of the project.Points available D: 12 -13.9Points available F: 11.9Overall analysis and critical thinking Value: 20 points20 pointsAnalysis and critical thinking is evident throughout the paper, beyond the requirements in the Project Description Points available: 18-2017.9 pointsPaper includes evidence of analysis and critical thinking beyond the requirements in the Project Description Points available: 16-17.915.9 pointsThe analysis and critical thinking is consistant with the requirements in the Project Description Points available: 14-15.913.9 pointsThe analysis and critical thinking reflected in this paper did not meet the requirements in the Project DescriptionPoints available D: 12-13.9Points available F: 0-11.9Responsiveness to Project Description: All elements are included. Value: 10 points10 pointsAssignment is formatted exactly as required.Points available: 9-108.9 pointsAssignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations.Points available: 8-8.97.9 pointsAssignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required element(s).Points available: 7-7.96.9 pointsAssignment is missing major elements, Points available D:6 - 6.9Points available F: 0-5.9Responsiveness to Project Description : Application of theory and knowledge to the facts presented, accurate use of terminology, etc. Value: 10 points10 pointsExcellent understanding and application of theory and knowledge to the facts. Terminology is correct in all uses.Points available: 9-108.9 pointsClear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.Most terminology references are correctly applied.Points available: 8-8.97.9 pointsApplication of theory, knowledge and terminology indicate understanding of the concepts and focus of the projectPoints available: 7-7.96.9 pointsTheory and knowledge does not apply to the facts presented.Use of terminology indicates a lack of understanding of the concepts and focus of the projectPoints available D: 6-6.9Points available F: 0-5.9Responsiveness to Project Description: Organization. Value: 10 points10 pointsOrganization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow that makes the project easier to follow. Points available: 9-108.9 pointsOrganization is clear and does not distract from the project’s content. Points available: 8-8.97.9 pointsOrganization presents some MINOR distractions from the project’s content.Points available: 7-7.96.9 pointsOrganization lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing that causes distraction for the reader. Points available D: 6-6.9Points available F: 0-5.9Formatting, references, and APA citations Value 15 points15 pointsAssignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are present and APA standards are followed in every respect. Points available 13.5-1513.4 pointsAssignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are present and APA standards are followed. Points available: 12-13.411.9 pointsAssignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/ sources or some APA errors are evident. Points available: 10.5-11.910.4 pointsAssignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation method is used correctly. Points available D: 9 - 10.4Points available F: 0-8.9General Grammar/Mechanics Value 15 points15 pointsNo or minor English and grammar usage errors. Points available 13.5-1513.4 pointsA few minor/ inconsequential mistakes in English and grammar. Points available 12-13.411.9 pointsSome, but acceptable mistakes in English and/or grammar. Points available: 10.5-11.910.4 pointsMany mistakes evident in English/grammar usage. Points available D: 9 - 10.4Points available F: 0-8.9Overall ScoreEquivalent to an A90 or moreEquivalent to an B80 or moreEquivalent to an C70 or moreEquivalent to a D or an F0 or more