LEARN MORE...

Home
Documents
June 2021
3
Oral Presentation and Final Paper Rubric (1)

Oral Presentation and Final Paper Rubric (1)

Content type

User Generated

Uploaded By

funzf1981

Pages

Showing Page:

1/3

EVALUATION CRITERIA: EBP Synthesis Paper (Final)

Points

earned

Points

possible

Total points =

ABSTRACT

• 250 words or less (not including title or keywords). *

• Clear, concise and accurate. *

• Includes problem, background, aims, methods, results,

conclusions, and keywords. *

INTRODUCTION

• Revision reflects integration of feedback from draft. *

• Well-written, clear, comprehensive and accurate. *

• Reflects critical analysis and synthesis of ideas. *

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF EVIDENCE:

Identification of EBP model (Stetler, Iowa, clinical) used for literature

review and model presented

• Discussion organized around validity, reliability and

applicability. *

• Clear, concise and comprehensive integrative review is

presented; studies are not presented individually one-at-a-time. *

• Review examines similarities/differences and strengths/limitations

across studies. *

• Discussion demonstrates clear understanding of research. *

Showing Page:

2/3

• Validity discussion is clear, comprehensive and accurate;

considers strengths and limitations of research design related to

error, bias and confounding variables. *

• Reliability discussion is clear, comprehensive and accurate;

considers strengths and limitations of research design related to

sample size, attrition, data collection and analysis, measurement

tools, statistical analysis and significance; analysis of consistency of

results across studies is presented. *

• Applicability discussion is clear, comprehensive and accurate;

considers generalizability of findings to author/provider’s own

practice; considers similarities and differences in beliefs, values and

characteristics of population/setting. *

IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

• Similarities and differences of findings with previous

studies/research are discussed. *

• Considers gaps in research: limitations, flaws, inconsistencies that

require further clarification and investigation; what is missing? what

is needed? *

• Overall, discussion demonstrates meaningful integration leading

to logical conclusions about the state of evidence related to the

topic. *

• Limits of current EBP review are addressed. *

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

• Clearly states what practice change is needed; answers PICOT

question. *

• Identifies what limits and/or special considerations to

implementation of recommended practice change are indicated. *

EBP IMPLEMENTATION MODEL APPLICATION

Showing Page:

3/3

Unformatted Attachment Preview

EVALUATION CRITERIA: EBP Synthesis Paper (Final) Points Points earned possible 60 Total points = ABSTRACT • 250 words or less (not including title or keywords). * • Clear, concise and accurate. * • 2 Includes problem, background, aims, methods, results, conclusions, and keywords. * INTRODUCTION • Revision reflects integration of feedback from draft. * 3 • Well-written, clear, comprehensive and accurate. * • Reflects critical analysis and synthesis of ideas. * CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF EVIDENCE: Identification of EBP model (Stetler, Iowa, clinical) used for literature review and model presented • Discussion organized around validity, reliability and applicability. * 15 • Clear, concise and comprehensive integrative review is presented; studies are not presented individually one-at-a-time. * • Review examines similarities/differences and strengths/limitat ...
Purchase document to see full attachment