LEARN MORE...

Home
Documents
June 2021
3
Case Study Analysis Grading Rubric

Case Study Analysis Grading Rubric

Content type

User Generated

Uploaded By

funzf1981

Pages

Showing Page:

1/3

NURS 752

Page 1 of 3

CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS GRADING RUBRIC

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced 94-100%

Proficient 87-93%

Developing 1-86%

Not Present

Problem presented

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Risk factors addressed

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Evaluation of current state

of problem and its

treatment included

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Appropriateness of

medications

10 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

9 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 8 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Showing Page:

2/3

NURS 752

Page 2 of 3

Additional information

needed to adequately

assess the problem and to

make recommendations

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Desired therapeutic

outcomes are stated

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Non-pharmacological

recommendations included

5 to 5 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

4 to 4 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 3 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Pharmacological

recommendations included

14 to 15 points

Submits factually

correct, reflexive

information and

demonstrates full

development of concept

and thought

13 to 13 points

Submits factually

correct information,

but it lacks full

development of

concept or thought.

1 to 12 points

Submits information

that repeats and lacks

full development of

concept or thought.

0 points

Submits information

that is off-topic,

incorrect, or irrelevant

and lacks full

development concept

and thought.

Showing Page:

3/3

Unformatted Attachment Preview

NURS 752 CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS GRADING RUBRIC Criteria Content 70% Problem presented Risk factors addressed Evaluation of current state of problem and its treatment included Appropriateness of medications Advanced 94-100% 5 to 5 points Submits factually correct, reflexive information and demonstrates full development of concept and thought 5 to 5 points Submits factually correct, reflexive information and demonstrates full development of concept and thought 5 to 5 points Submits factually correct, reflexive information and demonstrates full development of concept and thought 10 points Submits factually correct, reflexive information and demonstrates full development of concept and thought Levels of Achievement Proficient 87-93% Developing 1-86% 4 to 4 points 1 to 3 points Submits factually Submits information correct information, that repeats and lacks but it lacks full full develo ...
Purchase document to see full attachment