Read the case given and answer the questions: Case Study Resolving Ethical Business Challenges * Kent was getting pressure from his boss, parents, and wife about the marketing campaign for Broadway Corporation’s new video game called “Lucky.” He had been working for Broadway for about two years, and the Lucky game was his first big project. After Kent and his wife, Amy, graduated from college, they decided to go back to their hometown of Las Cruces, New Mexico, near the Mexican border. Kent’s father knew the president of Broadway, which enabled Kent to get a job in its marketing department. Broadway is a medium-size company with about 500 employees, making it one of the largest employers in Las Cruces. Broadway develops, manufactures, and markets video arcade games Within the video arcade industry, competition is fierce. Games typically have a life cycle of only 18 to 24 months. One of the key strategies in the industry is providing unique, visually stimulating games by using color graphics technology, fast action, and participant interaction. The target markets for Broadway’s video products are children aged 5 to 12 and teenagers aged 13 to 19. Males constitute 75 percent of the market. When Kent first started with Broadway, his task was to conduct market research on the types of games that players desired. His research showed that the market wanted more action (violence), quicker graphics, multiple levels of difficulty, and sound. Further research showed that certain tones and types of sound were more pleasing than others. As part of his research, Kent also observed people in video arcades, where he found that many became hypnotized by a game and would quickly put in quarters when told to do so. Research suggested that many target consumers exhibited the same symptoms as compulsive gamblers. Kent’s research results were well received by the company, which developed several new games using his information. The new games were instant hits with the market. In his continuing research, Kent found that the consumer’s level of intensity increased as the game’s intensity level increased. Several reports later, Kent suggested that target consumers might be willing, at strategic periods in a video game, to insert multiple coins. For example, a player who wanted to move to a higher level of difficulty would have to insert two coins; to play the final level, three coins would have to be inserted. When the idea was tested, Kent found it did increase game productivity. Kent also noticed that video games that gave positive reinforcements to the consumer, such as audio cues, were played much more frequently than others. He reported his findings to Brad, Broadway’s president, who asked Kent to apply the information to the development of new games. Kent suggested having the machines give candy to the game players when they attained specific goals. For the teen market, the company modified the idea: The machines would give back coins at certain levels during the game. Players could then use the coins at strategic levels to play a “slot-type” chance opening of the next level. By inserting an element of chance, these games generated more coin input than output, and game productivity increased dramatically. These innovations were quite successful, giving Broadway a larger share of the market and Kent a promotion to product manager. Kent’s newest assignment was the Lucky game—a fast-action scenario in which the goal was to destroy the enemy before being destroyed. Kent expanded on the slot-type game for the older market, with two additions. First, the game employed virtual reality technology, which gives the player the sensation of actually being in the game. Second, keeping in mind that most of the teenage consumers were male, Kent incorporated a female character who, at each level, removed a piece of her clothing and taunted the player. A win at the highest level left her nude. Test market results suggested that the two additions increased profitability per game dramatically. Several weeks later, Brad asked about the Lucky project. “I think we’ve got a real problem, Brad,” Kent told him. “Maybe the nudity is a bad idea. Some people will be really upset about it.” Brad was displeased with Kent’s response. Word got around fast that the Lucky project had stalled. During dinner with his parents, Kent mentioned the Lucky project, and his dad said something that affected Kent. “You know, son, the Lucky project will bring in a great deal of revenue for Broadway, and jobs are at stake. Some of your coworkers are upset with your stand on this project. I’m not telling you what to do, but there’s more at stake here than just a video game.” The next day Kent had a meeting with Brad about Lucky. “Well,” Brad asked, “what have you decided?” Kent answered, “I don’t think we should go with the nudity idea.” Brad answered, “You know, Kent, you’re right. The U.S. market just isn’t ready to see full nudity as well as graphic violence in arcades in their local malls. That’s why I’ve contacted an Internet provider who will take our game and put it on the Internet as an adult product. I’ve also checked out the foreign markets and found that we can sell the machines to the Mexican market if we tone down the violence. The Taiwanese joint venture group has okayed the version we have now, but they would like you to develop something that is more graphic in both areas. You see, they already have similar versions of this type of game now, and their market is ready to go to the next level. I see the Internet market as secondary because we can’t get the virtual reality equipment and software into an Internet mode. Maybe when PCs get faster, we’ll be able to tap into it at that level, but not now. So, Kent, do you understand what you need to be doing on Lucky?” Question(s): 1. Identify and discuss the ethical and legal issues? What are Kent’s options? (600 words)- 5 Marks 2. Discuss the acceptability and commercial use of sex, violence, and gambling in the United States. (Minimum 2 options & 2 consequences, 400 words)- 3 Marks 3. Are marketing sex, violence, and gambling acceptable in other countries if they fit their culture? (At least 2 options, 300 words)-2 Marks *This case is strictly hypothetical; any resemblance to real persons, companies, or situations is coincidental.

Principles of Federal Acquisitions Describe when it is too late to file a claim. What are the most common mistakes the government makes terminating a default?

Benchmark Rhetorical AnalysisCDC's Web page about ADHD.https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.htmlObjectives: Analyze the writer's purposes, audience, genre, and style within a public document. Write a rough draft of a Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document. Write a Peer Review of a classmate’s rough draft.First Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis Description: Refer to the attached document for instructions on completing this assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Peer Review of a Classmate’s First Draft of a Rhetorical Analysis of a Public Document Description: Please follow these steps: Begin by posting your Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft by the deadline to TWO places: to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review Forum AND to the Topic 2 Rhetorical Analysis Rough Draft assignment box. Review the media piece: "Peer Review Using Rubrics" located in the Course Material folder for information on effective peer reviews. Next, review the draft of the person who posted his/her response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted. Look again at the CDC's Web page about ADHD. In 150-200 words, please analyze the document’s purpose and audience. Who, for example, is the CDC's audience? What are the CDC's beliefs about ADHD, and how does the CDC's Web page relate itself to those beliefs? Why would the federal government post a Web page about ADHD? What role does the general public expect the government to play regarding disorders such as ADHD?Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Topic 2. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.Are the introduction, body, and conclusion clearly defined? Does the introduction provide sufficient background for the reader? Is there a thesis statement that makes the main ideas of the essay clear? Does every paragraph address the subject matter of the thesis in some way? Does the essay show that the writer has a knowledge of the audience? Is there credible support, specific examples, detail to make your points clearly? Is the tone and voice formal enough for an academic essay? Have all requirements of the assignment been met? Are all sources credible? Have all quoted, paraphrased, and summarized material been cited in-text with a corresponding reference on the reference page? Is the grammar and punctuation correct? Has the writer spell checked the essay? Is the title capitalized correctly? Are the correct margin and font and other requirements of GCU style correct?Which website did you choose to evaluate for your essay assignment? Please provide the URL of the website and the name. Post a message in which you describe your web site (at least one paragraph), and then offer some analysis of the website and how it meets the criteria (at least one more paragraph). Which of the criteria you learned about earlier will you apply to the website and why? Do you feel your website matches up to the criteria, and does it appear to be an effective and valuable website? Use details and examples from the website to support your answer. During the week, review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.Rhetorical Analysis- I added information from the NAMI webiste regarding their annual nami walk and their resources online provided for mental health including ADHDDescription: Go back to your readings in Chapter 4 of the text on bias. Reread the information to help you answer this question. Remember that bias can be found on a website. View the website noted here: https://www.naturalchild.org/articles/guest/john_breeding.html. page 15 of 21 1. 2. 3. 4. What indications do you have that the site is biased or not biased? List three things that appear to make this site biased or unbiased. Finally, based on the criteria you have been learning about websites, do you believe this site is true and honest, or does it have an agenda? How might you address bias in your evaluation essay? During the week, go back and review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses?Commentary Writing Assignment Research and Invention for Commentaries First Draft of a Commentary Description: Refer to the attached resource for instructions on completing this assignment. You are required to submit this assignment Evaluate unique qualities and patterns in a trend, event, or policy. Create meaning from an analysis of a trend, event, or policy. Write a rough draft of a commentary. Conduct a peer review of a commentary.Description: Revise the draft you have written, utilizing the feedback from your peer review. Complete your revision in conjunction with the guidelines for the first draft assignment given in Topic 6. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Please open the attached document to obtain your Writing Self-Review Assignment. You need to write your short responses on the document, save, and upload this document to the assignment drop box. GCU style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Submit this assignment to your instructor, in the assignment drop box, by Day 7 of Week 7.Drafts and final APA Formatting and Style Guide