Looking at the data calculated I need help answering 2 short answer questions #4 and #6. Question 4) What do you hypothesize is the agent responsible for the outbreak? Question 6) What is the case definition for the agent suspected in this particular outbreak?

Create a 15-20 slide professional development presentation for general education teachers on the topics of IEPs, inclusion, and team teaching. Include a title slide, reference slide, and presenter's notes.Address the following within the presentation:Provide a synopsis for each section of an IEP.Describe an inclusion classroom setting and when it is beneficial for special education students; include specific examples of special education students appropriately and inappropriately placed in an inclusive setting.Describe 3-5 team teaching models and include benefits and drawbacks of each.Provide and describe three additional team teaching strategies appropriate for modifications in an inclusive setting.Use the attached IEP templates to inform the assignment. Support your presentation with a minimum of three scholarly resources.While APA format is not required for the body of the assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines.EXTRA INFORMATION THAT MAY HELP IN ASSIGNMENT1. A Guide to the Individualized Education ProgramRead "Individualized Education Programs: Process and Procedures for Developing IEPs for Students with Disabilities," located on the U.S. Department of Education website. http://www2.ed.gov/parents/needs/speced/iepguide/index.html 2. Inclusion Classrooms and Teachers: A Survey of Current PracticesRead "Inclusion Classrooms and Teachers: A Survey of Current Practices," by Kilanowski-Press, Foote, and Rinaldo, from the International Journal of Special Education (2010).http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ909035.pdfRUBRICProfessional Development: IEPs, Inclusion, and Team Teaching 1No Evidence0.00%2Nominal Evidence69.00%3Unacceptable Evidence74.00%4Acceptable Evidence87.00%5Target Evidence100.00%100.0 %Criteria 20.0 %Professional Development: IEPsNo submission.Presentation fails to provide synopses of IEP sections.Presentation includes inadequate synopses of IEP sections.Presentation includes adequate synopses of IEP sections.Presentation includes thorough and clear synopses of IEP sections.30.0 %Professional Development: InclusionNo submission.Presentation fails to include a description of an inclusion classroom setting or rationalization of appropriately and inappropriately placed special education students.Presentation includes an insufficient description of an inclusion classroom setting. Rationalization of appropriately and inappropriately placed special education students is provided, but is lacking.Presentation includes a detailed description of an inclusion classroom setting. Adequate rationalization of appropriately and inappropriately placed special education students is provided.Presentation includes a professional and detailed description of an inclusion classroom setting. Comprehensive and clear rationalization of appropriately and inappropriately placed special education students is provided.35.0 %Professional Development: Team TeachingNo submission.Presentation fails to include descriptions of team teaching models or benefits and drawbacks of each. Descriptions for additional team teaching strategies are not provided.Presentation includes inadequate descriptions of team teaching models and inappropriately includes benefits and drawbacks of each. Incomplete descriptions for additional team teaching strategies are provided and are inappropriate for modifications in an inclusive setting.Presentation includes adequate descriptions of team teaching models and appropriately includes benefits and drawbacks of each. Descriptions for additional team teaching strategies are provided and are appropriate for modifications in an inclusive setting.Presentation includes comprehensive descriptions of team teaching models and appropriately includes benefits and drawbacks of each. Complete descriptions for additional team teaching strategies are provided and are appropriate for modifications in an inclusive setting.5.0 %LayoutNo submission.The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text and small point size of fonts, inappropriate contrasting colors, poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting. No notes that script the presentation are included.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy-to-read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. Minimal notes are present to script the presentation.The layout background and text complement each other and enables the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy-to-read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. Notes are present to script and facilitate the presentation.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of text. Notes are well written and facilitate the delivery of the script in the presentation.5.0 %Mechanics of WritingNo submission.Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors.5.0 %Title and Research Citations SourcesNo submission.Contains no title slide, no References section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation.Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not cited consistently or correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation, but with some errors.Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but not consistently cited correctly. References included within the body of the presentation, but with some citation errors.Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. References within the body of the presentation are included and correctly cited.100 %Total Weightage

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Due Thursday It is essential that you learn to describe the biological, physiological, and psychosocial characteristics unique to older women. All women have the right to safe and satisfying health care that promotes self-determination and supports self-care.Advanced practice nurse practitioners like Family Nurse Practitioners (FNP) and Certified Nurse Midwives (CNM) are uniquely suited to provide the best care to women. For this care to be effective, we need to understand, respect, and honor each women’s particular needs by addressing personal, cultural, and developmental aspects of their care.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:What are some gendered assumptions about women’s anatomy?What are some examples of cultural beliefs that could impact your care to women?Provide example of generalizations about women’s health. What are some of the risks of making these generalizations about women’s health?Due Monday Post 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. Be constructive and professional.