For this assignment  you will demonstrate application of the effectiveness of these three service delivery models, Pull-out, inclusion, and co-teaching primarily used to provide instruction and educational supports for students with specific learning disabilities and discuss the following:  Part I: Pull-out, inclusion, and co-teaching are three instructional or service-delivery models primarily used to provide instruction and educational supports for students with specific learning disabilities. To demonstrate application of the effectiveness of these three service delivery models, discuss the following: Research-based achievement outcomes among students with specific learning disabilities who have been exposed to each of these three service-delivery models. Research-based type and quality of teaching occurring within each of these three service-delivery models. Research-based student and teacher perspectives of each of these three service-delivery models. Implications for programmatic practices through the lens of a special education leader.

Goals are an integral part of the strategic planning. Look at one aspect of a business: sales. They have hourly, weekly, and monthly goals, coupled with a plethora of conversion rates for sales activities which are a guiding force in the industry. Failure to meet goals results in lost revenue and lost jobs.Regardless of what position you hold in a company, you are part of the planning process.Strategic Planning ResearchUsing the class text and, predominately, articles from Trident Library’s full-text databases (like Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete and/or ProQuest Central), research the following:How to write, measure, and apply “SMART” objectives for business.How to apply “Balanced Scorecard” in the planning process.Incentives: research the type of incentives that work for helping employees meet objectives.Since you are engaging in research, be sure to cite and reference the sources in APA format. NOTE: Failure to use research with accompanying citations to support content will result in reduced scoring “Level 2-Developing” for Meets Assignment Requirements, Critical Thinking, and Use of Sources and Mechanics on the grading rubric.The paper should be written in the third person; this means words like “I,” “we,” and “you” are not appropriate. Refer to yourself in the third person as “manager,” or you can write about what the “project team” will do, rather than saying “I” and “we.”Assignment ExpectationsUse the APA-formatted template (MGT280 Case2) to create your submission.Your submission will include:Trident University International’s cover pageA 3-page paper with APA citations (2- or 3-sentence introduction, 3-page body, 2- or 3-sentence conclusion)The reference list page in APA formatGrading Note:At Trident University International, rubrics are used for grading. These rubrics specify the points available for each component of an assignment. Points are earned based on the level of the work submitted. The rubric in the Case Dropbox is used for this Case Assignment.https://hbr.org/2013/08/how-effective-a-leader-are-youhttps://granite.pressbooks.pub/principlesmanagement/chapter/6-8-your-personal-balanced-scorecard/https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/150032-MGT280-2020AUG24FT-1/Principles-of-Management%20Chapter%2015-%20The%20Essentials%20of%20Control.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=G2yeCxR0ZrSBOl9CxY4fcUpn9&ou=150032https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/150032-MGT280-2020AUG24FT-1/Principles-of-Management%20Chapter%206-%2https://tlc.trident.edu/content/enforced/150032-MGT280-2020AUG24FT-1/Principles-of-Management%20Chapter%205-%20Strategizing.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=G2yeCxR0ZrSBOl9CxY4fcUpn9&ou=1500320Goals%20and%20Objectives.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=G2yeCxR0ZrSBOl9CxY4fcUpn9&ou=150032

Week 3: Collaboration CafeNo unread replies. No replies.With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolPreview the document. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:Description of the purposeExplanation of research designDiscussion of sampleDescription of data collection methodsSummary of findingsStrengths of the study (minimum of 1)Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.