Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Persuasive essay operation geronimo

Content type
User Generated
Rating
Showing Page:
1/6
1
Persuasive Essay: Operation Geronimo
Student's Name
Course Name and Number
Question
1) “President Obama had the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the plan”; or,
(2) “President Obama did not have the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the
plan”.
When a nation contemplates the use of force, that force must be done with legal authority and within
the strictures of the laws of armed conflict. If there is both legal authority and that force follows the
principles laid down by The Hague Rules of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions of 1949 then there can be
a justified result. After September 11, 2001, Congress authorized the Commander-in-Chief at the time to
use force against those individuals who had perpetrated the attack on the United States that fateful day.
Under our constitutional scheme, the President could direct the National Command Authority to use
armed force against Al Qaeda, including Bin Laden and others. Additional international authorizations
via the United Nations and NATO followed. Overlaid in this authorization to use force was the basic
international principle of the inherent right of a nation to self-defense, found in Art. 51 of the UN
Charter.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/6
2
Persuasive Essay: Operation Geronimo
Osama Bin Laden was killed on May 2nd, 2011, at Abbottabad after a raid by the navy
seals. Subsequently, there were mixed reactions regarding the death of Osama Bin Laden. Some
individuals celebrated the actions of the navy seals as the era of a leader who had orchestrated
numerous attacks in the past had come to an end. However, some stakeholders were concerned if
Operation Geronimo had been legal. The criticism associated with Operation Geronimo was
based on the constraints of international law that significantly regulated the use of lethal force.
Individuals believe that America had violated international law by crossing the border of
Pakistan and undertaking a military operation against Osama Bin Laden. The secretive nature of
the operation also translated to a situation where the Pakistan government was not aware of
Operation Geronimo by America. Similarly, conflicting information was presented by multiple
officials that did not effectively address the legality concerns of Operation Geronimo Despite the
concerns regarding the legality of Operation Geronimo, multiple aspects such as the law of
proportionality, the concept of necessity, and the law of armed conflict confirm that President
Obama had legal authority.
To begin with, the concept of proportionality has been developed by the International
Humanitarian Law used to determine if military response characterized by the use of lethal force
is valid in an armed conflict. The ideology focuses on creating a correlation between the severity
of the crime and the ideal punishment (Nolte, 2017). It is worth pointing out that Osama Bin
laden Was responsible for panning the September 11
th
attack in America that led to many
Americans' death and the destruction of property (Wright & DiCarlo, 2019). Likewise, the
terrorist leader had been closely linked with other terrorist malpractices, such as the bombing of
the US Embassy located in Nairobi (Bushnell, 2018). The severity of these crimes explains how

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/6

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 6 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1 Persuasive Essay: Operation Geronimo Student's Name Course Name and Number Question 1) “President Obama had the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the plan”; or, (2) “President Obama did not have the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the plan”. When a nation contemplates the use of force, that force must be done with legal authority and within the strictures of the laws of armed conflict. If there is both legal authority and that force follows the principles laid down by The Hague Rules of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions of 1949 then there can be a justified result. After September 11, 2001, Congress authorized the Commander-in-Chief at the time to use force against those individuals who had perpetrated the attack on the United States that fateful day. Under our constitutional scheme, the President could direct the National Command Authority to use armed force against Al Qaeda, including Bin Laden and others. Additional international authorizations via the United Nations and NATO followed. Overlaid in this authorization to use force was the basic international principle of the inherent right of a nation to self-defense, found in Art. 51 of the UN Charter. 2 Persuasive Essay: Operation Geronimo Osama Bin Laden was killed on May 2nd, 2011, at Abbottabad after a raid by the navy seals. Subsequently, there were mixed reactions regarding the death of Osama Bin Laden. Some individuals celebrated the actions of the navy ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
I was stuck on this subject and a friend recommended Studypool. I'm so glad I checked it out!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4