Case StudyYou keep looking over the Green Company's financial statements to see where your analysis is going wrong. You are certain that the company is not experiencing revenue growth that would support the consistent increase in the inventories that are being reflected on the balance sheet. You just finished a comprehensive audit of all the physical controls of inventory, so you doubt that inventory is being stolen. Everything else in the financials seems to look fine. In fact, they seem to indicate that the company is improving in profitability.Using both the required text and external resources, address each of the questions below. Your responses should range between 2-4 strong paragraphs for each question, with references appropriately cited. Visuals (tables, charts, graphs) are encouraged as a tool in summarizing major points.What might be a valid reason for the increase in Green Company's inventory cost?Assuming that fraud is being committed, how could a fraud perpetrator commit this type of fraud?What could be done to prevent this type of fraud?

The sign of an effective clinician is the  ability to identify the criteria that distinguish the diagnosis from any  other possibility (otherwise known as a differential diagnosis). An  ambiguous clinical diagnosis can lead to a faulty course of treatment  and hurt the client more than it helps. In this Assignment, using the  DSM-5 and all of the skills you have acquired to date, you assess a  client. This is a culmination of learning from all the weeks covered so far. To prepare: Use a differential diagnosis  process and analysis of the Mental Status Exam in the case provided by  your instructor to determine if the case meets the criteria for a  clinical diagnosis.  By Day 7 Submit a 4- to 5-page paper in which you: Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis. Remember, a full diagnosis should  include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity,  and the Z codes (other conditions that may need clinical attention). Explain the full diagnosis, matching the symptoms of the case to the criteria for any diagnoses used. Identify 2–3 of the close differentials that you considered for the  case and have ruled out. Concisely explain why these conditions were  considered but eliminated. Identify the assessments you recommend to validate treatment.  Explain the rationale behind choosing the assessment instruments to  support, clarify, or track treatment progress for the diagnosis. Explain your recommendations for initial resources and treatment.  Use scholarly resources to support your evidence-based treatment  recommendations. Explain how you took cultural factors and diversity into account when making the assessment and recommending interventions. Identify client strengths, and explain how you would utilize strengths throughout treatment. Identify specific knowledge or skills you would need to obtain to  effectively treat this client, and provide a plan on how you will do so.