Access Millions of academic & study documents

International business product life cycle theory

Content type
User Generated
Showing Page:
1/5
International Business
Product Life Cycle Theory
Raymond Vernon initially proposed the product life cycle theory in the mid-1960s.Vernon
argued that the wealth and size of the US market gave us firms a strong incentive to develop
cost-saving process innovations. Vernon further argued that most new products were initially
produced in America. Apparently, the pioneering firms believed it was better to keep production
facilities close to the market and to the firm’s centre of decision-making, given the uncertainty
and risks inherent in introducing new products. Also the demand for most new products to be
raised on non-price factors. Consequently, firms can charge relatively high prices for new
products, which obviate the need to look for low-cost production sites in other countries. Vernon
went on to argue that early in the life cycle of a typical new product, while demand is starting to
grow rapidly in the United States, demand in other advanced countries is limited to high-income
groups. The limited initial demand in other advanced countries does not make it worthwhile for
firms in those countries to start producing the new product, but it does necessitate some exports
from the United States to those countries. Overtime demand for the new product starts to grow in
other advanced countries (e.g. Great Britain, France, Germany and Japan). It becomes profitable
for foreign producers to begin producing for their home markets. In addition, US firms might set
up production facilities in those advanced countries where demand is growing. If cost pressures
become intense, the process might not stop there. The cycle by which the United States lost its
advantage to other advanced countries might be repeated once mare, as developing countries
(e.g. Thailand) begin to acquire a production advantage over advanced countries. Thus the focus
of global production initially switches from the United States to other advanced nations and then
from those nations to developing countries. The consequence of these trends is that over the time
the United States switches from being exporter of the producer to an importer of the product as
production becomes concentrated in lower-cost foreign locations and then developing countries.
Stages of Product Life Cycle
There are three stages of the product cycle.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/5
Stage 1: The New Product Innovation requires highly skilled labour and large quantities of
capital for research and development. The product will normally be most effectively designed
and initially manufactured near the parent firm and therefore in a highly industrialized market
due to the need for proximity, information and communication other than the many different
skilled-labour components required. In the development stage, the product is non-standardized.
The production process requires a high degree of flexibility (meaning continued use of highly
skilled labour). Costs of production are therefore quite high. The innovator at this stage is a
monopolist and therefore enjoys all of the benefits of monopoly power, including the high profit
margins required to repay the high development costs and expensive production process. Price
elasticity of demand at this stage is low; high-income consumers buy it regardless of cost.
Stage 2: The Maturing Product As production expands, its process becomes increasingly
standardized. The need for flexibility in design and manufacturing decline, and therefore, the
demand for highly skilled labour also decline. The innovating country increases its sales to other
countries. Competitors with slight variations develop, putting downward pressure on prices and
profit margins. Production costs are an increasing concern. As competitors increase their
pressures on price, the innovating firm faces critical decisions on how to maintain market share.
Vernon argues that the firm faces a critical decision at this stage, either to lose market share to
foreign-based manufacturers using cheaper labour or to maintain its market share by exploiting
the comparative advantages of factor costs by investing in other countries. This is one of the first
theoretical explanations of how trade and investment become increasingly intertwined.
Stage 3: The Standardized Product In this final stage, the product is completely standardized in
its manufacture. Thus, with access to capital in world capital markets, the country of production
is simply the one with the cheapest unskilled labour. Profit margins are thin and competition is
fierce. The product has largely run its course in terms of profitability for the innovating firm. The
country of comparative advantage therefore, shifts as the technology of the product’s
manufacture matures. The same product shifts in its production location. The country producing
the product during that stage enjoys the benefits of net trade surpluses. But such advantages are
fleeting, according to Vernon. As knowledge and technology continually change, so does the
comparative advantage of the producer country.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/5

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
4/5

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 5 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
International Business Product Life Cycle Theory Raymond Vernon initially proposed the product life cycle theory in the mid-1960s.Vernon argued that the wealth and size of the US market gave us firms a strong incentive to develop cost-saving process innovations. Vernon further argued that most new products were initially produced in America. Apparently, the pioneering firms believed it was better to keep production facilities close to the market and to the firm’s centre of decision-making, given the uncertainty and risks inherent in introducing new products. Also the demand for most new products to be raised on non-price factors. Consequently, firms can charge relatively high prices for new products, which obviate the need to look for low-cost production sites in other countries. Vernon went on to argue that early in the life cycle of a typical new product, while demand is starting to grow rapidly in the United States, demand in other advanced countries is limited to high-income groups. The limited initial demand in other advanced countries does not make it worthwhile for firms in those countries to start producing the new product, but it does necessitate some exports from the United States to those countries. Overtime demand for the new product starts to grow in other advanced countries (e.g. Great Britain, France, Germany and Japan). It becomes profitable for foreign producers to begin producing for their home markets. In addition, US firms might set up production facilit ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4