Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Economics work

Content type
User Generated
Rating
Showing Page:
1/4
Jim Willis was the Vice President of Marketing and Sales for International Satellite Images (ISI). ISI had
been building a satellite to image the world at a resolution of one meter. At that resolution, a trained
photo interpreter could identify virtually any military and civilian vehicle, as well as numerous other
military and non-military objects. The ISI team had been preparing a proposal for a Japanese
government contractor. The contract called for a commitment of a minimum imagery purchase of $10
million per year for five years. In a recent executive staff meeting, it became clear that the ISI satellite
camera subcontractor was having trouble with the development of a thermal stabilizer for the
instrument. It appeared that the development delay would be at least one year and possibly 18 months.
When Jim approached Fred Ballard, the President of ISI, for advice on what launch date to put into the
proposal, Fred told Jim to use the published date because that was still the official launch date. When
Jim protested that the use of an incorrect date was clearly unethical, Fred said, “Look Jim, no satellite
has ever been launched on time. Everyone, including our competitors, publishes very aggressive launch
dates. Customers understand the tentative nature of launch schedules. In fact, it is so common that
customers factor into their plans the likelihood that spacecraft will not be launched on time. If we
provided realistic dates, our launch dates would be so much later than those published by our
competitors that we would never be able to sell any advanced contracts. So do not worry about it, just
use the published date and we will revise it in a few months.” Fred’s words were not very comforting to
Jim. It was true that satellite launch dates were seldom met, but putting a launch date into a proposal
that ISI knew was no longer possible seemed underhanded. He wondered about the ethics of such a
practice and the effect on his own reputation.
The Industry
Companies from four nationsthe United States, France, Russia, and Israelcontrolled the satellite
imaging industry. The U.S. companies had a clear advantage in technology and imagery clarity. In the
United States, three companies dominated: Lockart, Global Sciences, and ISI. Each of these companies
had received a license from the U.S. government to build and launch a satellite able to identify objects
as small as one square meter. However, none had yet been able to successfully launch a commercial
satellite with such a fine resolution. Currently, all of the companies had announced a launch date within
six months of the ISI published launch date. Further, each company had to revise its launch date at least
once, and in the case of Global Sciences, twice. Each time a company had revised its launch date,
ongoing international contract negotiations with that company had been either stalled or terminated.
Financing a Satellite Program
The construction and ongoing operations of each of the programs was financed by venture capitalists.
The venture capitalists relied heavily on advance contract acquisition to ensure the success of their
investment. As a result, if any company was unable to acquire sufficient advance contracts, or if one
company appeared to be gaining a lead on the others, there was a real possibility that the financiers
would pull the plug on the other projects and the losing companies would be forced to stop production

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4
and possibly declare bankruptcy. The typical advance contract target was 150% of the cost of building
and launching a satellite. Since the cost to build and launch was $200 million, each company was striving
to acquire $300 million in advance contracts. Advance contracts were typically written like franchise
licensing agreements. Each franchisee guaranteed to purchase a minimum amount of imagery per year
for five years, the engineered life of the satellite. In addition, each franchisee agreed to acquire the
capability to receive, process, and archive the images sent to them from the satellite. Typically, the
hardware and software cost was between $10 million and $15 million per installation. Because the data
from each satellite was different, much of the software could not be used for multiple programs. In
exchange, the franchisee was granted an exclusive reception and selling territory. The amount of each
contract was dependent on the anticipated size of the market, the number of possible competitors in
the market, and the readiness of the local military and civilian agencies to use the imagery. Thus, a
contract in Africa would sell for as little as $1 million per year, whereas in several European countries
$5$10 million was not unreasonable. The problem was complicated by the fact that in each market
there were usually only one or two companies with the financial strength and market penetration to
become a successful franchisee. Therefore, each of the U.S. companies had targeted these companies as
their prime prospects.
The Current Problem
Japan was expected to be the third largest market for satellite imagery after the United States and
Europe. Imagery sales in Japan were estimated to be from $20 million to $30 million per year. Although
the principal user would be the Japanese government, for political reasons the government had made it
clear that they would be purchasing data through a local Japanese company. One Japanese company,
Higashi Trading Company (HTC), had provided most of the imagery for civilian and military use to the
Japanese government.
ISI had been negotiating with HTC for the past six months. It was no secret that HTC had also been
meeting with representatives from Lockart and Global Sciences. HTC had sent several engineers to ISI to
evaluate the satellite and its construction progress. Jim Willis believed that ISI was currently the front-
runner in the quest to sign HTC to a $10 million annual contract. Over five years, that one contract
would represent one sixth of the contracts necessary to ensure sufficient venture capital to complete
the satellite. Jim was concerned that if a new launch date was announced, HTC would delay signing a
contract. Jim was equally concerned that if HTC learned that Jim and his team knew of the camera
design problems and knowingly withheld announcement of a new launch date until after completing
negotiations, not only his personal reputation but that of ISI would be damaged. Furthermore, as with
any franchise arrangement, mutual trust was critical to the success of each party. Jim was worried that
even if only a 12-month delay in launch occurred, trust would be broken between ISI and the Japanese.
Jim’s boss, Fred Ballard, had specifically told Jim that launch date information was company proprietary

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Jim Willis was the Vice President of Marketing and Sales for International Satellite Images (ISI). ISI had been building a satellite to image the world at a resolution of one meter. At that resolution, a trained photo interpreter could identify virtually any military and civilian vehicle, as well as numerous other military and non-military objects. The ISI team had been preparing a proposal for a Japanese government contractor. The contract called for a commitment of a minimum imagery purchase of $10 million per year for five years. In a recent executive staff meeting, it became clear that the ISI satellite camera subcontractor was having trouble with the development of a thermal stabilizer for the instrument. It appeared that the development delay would be at least one year and possibly 18 months. When Jim approached Fred Ballard, the President of ISI, for advice on what launch date to put into the proposal, Fred told Jim to use the published date because that was still the official launch date. When Jim protested that the use of an incorrect date was clearly unethical, Fred said, “Look Jim, no satellite has ever been launched on time. Everyone, including our competitors, publis ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4