Complete your Week 8 discussion prompt.Fifteen-year-old Dolores was embarrassed to talk with her mother about the pain she felt in her “private parts,” but she was worried she might have gotten a disease, despite Nick’s assurance that she was his “first.” Her mother insisted that Dolores see a doctor, who discovered cervical lesions caused by a virus associated with cancer.What sexually transmitted virus is involved?How should the physician treat the lesions?How could Dolores have protected herself?

DQ one : Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your EBP proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. DQ Two: The Institute of Medicine has stated a goal that 90% of practice be evidence-based by 2020. According to HealthyPeople.gov, the United States is currently at approximately 15%. Discuss two barriers that might hold nursing practice from achieving this goal, and suggest ways in which identified barriers may be addressed.  

Part 1: Choose one competency and explain how it will help you to be successful both academically and professionally.Part 2: Choose a second competency and explain how it will help you to be successful both academically and professionally. Requirements:MLA Format (See Purdue Owl (Links to an external site.) for example)250 word minimumOne in-text citation from College Success (Links to an external site.)Tips:Restate the competency prior to addressing it.Use specific examples of assignments, projects, tasks, and/or responsibilities from your studies and career field as support.Utilize the following sources as needed for composition support:Grammarly (Links to an external site.)Tutor.com (Links to an external site.)Use the prompt as an outline and equally address all aspects.Review the rubric. RubricCriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity (2020-2021)threshold: 23.0 pts25 ptsExemplary - The journal entry abides by the format guidelines. The use of Standard English grammar, mechanics and MLA formatting is nearly flawless and contributes to the exceptional readability and clarity of the critical thinking reflection.23 ptsAccomplished - The journal entry abides by the format guidelines. Grammar and formatting mistakes do not significantly interfere with the readability or clarity of the critical thinking reflection.19 ptsDeveloping - The journal entry deviates somewhat from the format guidelines and/or grammar errors detract from the readability and the clarity of the critical thinking journal.13 ptsBeginning - The journal entry has no discernible organizational structure and/or grammar and formatting errors are present throughout. It is difficult to read and to understand the critical thinking reflection.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLogic (2020-2021)threshold: 23.0 pts25 ptsExemplary - The ideas are logically connected and flow well. The journal entry contains thorough and thoughtful conclusions that have emerged from analysis and evaluations.23 ptsAccomplished - Most of the ideas are logically connected. The journal entry contains reasonable conclusions that have emerged from analysis and evaluation.19 ptsDeveloping - Not all of the ideas are connected logically. The journal entry contains conclusions but further analysis may be needed.13 ptsBeginning - There is little evidence that the student used analysis and evaluation to arrive at the conclusions.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance (2020-2021)threshold: 23.0 pts25 ptsExemplary - The journal entry illuminates the topic by providing more than one specific example or an especially insightful example that relates personal experience to understanding the journal question or prompt. The use of in-text citations from the course textbook provide relevant support for the conclusions drawn.23 ptsAccomplished - The journal entry illuminates the topic by including at least one specific example that relates personal experience to understanding the journal question or prompt. An in-text citation from the course textbook is used to support the conclusions drawn.19 ptsDeveloping - Some information provided addresses the topic and displays and attempts to relate a personal experience to understanding the journal question or prompt. The textbook is cited within the journal.13 ptsBeginning - Information provided neither relates to the topic nor displays understanding that related experience should be provided. There is no in-text citation from the course textbook.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance (2020-2021)threshold: 23.0 pts25 ptsExemplary - The journal entry is exceptional at focusing on the most important, information, ideas and concepts of the issue under discussion.23 ptsAccomplished - The journal entry focuses on import ant, information, ideas and concepts of the issue under discussion.19 ptsDeveloping - The journal entry focuses on some important, information, ideas and concepts of the issue under discussion.13 ptsBeginning - The journal entry does not focus on important, information, ideas and concepts of the issue under discussion.25 pts