Access Millions of academic & study documents

Miranda V. Arizona

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Law
School
Academy of Massage Therapy - Hackensack
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running Head: MIRANDA V. ARIZONA Miranda V. Arizona Institution: Student’s Name: Date: 2 MIRANDA V. ARIZONA Miranda v. Arizona case Police officers arrested Ernesto Miranda and took him in custody. At the police station, two officers interrogated Miranda for about two hours. The police officers did not inform Miranda of his rights to remain silent and self-incrimination prior to the interrogation. During the questioning, Miranda confessed to the crimes. The police captured the oral and written confession and forced Miranda to sign. The jury found Miranda guilty during the trial because of the confessions presented by the police (Saltzburg, 2005). The court charged him with kidnapping and rape for 20-30 years. The case began in 1963 with the arrest of Miranda. The argument and trial occurred in 1966. At trial, the court appointed lawyer Alvin Moore to represent Miranda. In the appeal to the Supreme Court, Attorney John Paul represented Miranda. Both the attorneys argued against the violation of Miranda’s rights to remain silent and that of self-incrimination. The counsel argued against the violation of his client’s rights. Moore argued that Miranda’s rights were violated ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4