Unit 3 Assignment - Staff Roles and ResponsibilitiesSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 60 Submitting a text entry box or a file uploadInstructionsEstimated time to complete: 3 hoursEach member of staff needs an assigned role in the EMR implementation project. Instructions:Identify a role and duties for each staff member for the transition process (three physicians, one nurse practitioner, three MA’s and the front office individual and duties in the transition process. Take into consideration job duties of each person and the time required in the clinic performing those duties. Remember, each member of staff needs to play a role in the implementation and change process. Detail the duties and responsibilities of each role.For ideas on the roles and responsibilities in a time of change, view the following resource, Creating a Leadership Team for Successful EHR Implementation (Links to an external site.)Complete additional research as necessary (3 references, minimum)Reference:Department of Health and Human Services (2013). Creating a Leadership Team for Successful HER Implementation (Links to an external site.)[Online Word Document]RubricUnit 3 Assignment – Staff Roles and ResponsibilitiesUnit 3 Assignment – Staff Roles and ResponsibilitiesCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.17.6 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.15.2 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.8.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.4.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P20.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.17.6 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.15.2 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.8.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.4.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting15.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.13.2 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.11.4 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.6.0 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 60.0PreviousNext

1-Identify a cardiac or respiratory issue and outline the key steps necessary to include for prevention and health promotion.2-Discuss what resources are often necessary for nonacute care for cardiorespiratory issues. Explain how they support patient independence and decrease readmission.Respond each question independently,below each answer place a 2 or more references from sources previously used.Thanks