Hello this is the work I need help with. It is a Statistical Analysis Report for Research 1: Stats for Psychology. 7-2 Final Project Submission: Statistical Analysis ReportInstructionsSubmit your statistical analysis report. In this submission, you will complete Section II, Parts C, D, E, and F; Section III, Part A; and Sections IV and V. You will then combine those with the work you have done in your milestones, revised to incorporate all feedback gained throughout the course. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final project.Below is the feedback that I received for the Method that needs to be used for my data set.Feedback for 4-2 Final Project Milestone Two: What Method Will You Use?Top of Form Submission Feedback Data Analysis: Sample Size: Your sample size is N = 425. Data Analysis: Statistical Procedures: Correlation is the appropriate analysis for your data set because you are looking at how two variables (month and temperature) relate to crawling. Articulation of Response: Make sure to cite your sources if you use any. Also, it would be great if you elaborated on your ideas some more. Does the research question for your data set indicate (a) there is one sample and (b) the question aims to find a relationship between two variables? You want a correlation. A correlation determines the magnitude and direction of relationship between two variables (e.g., amount of sleep 30 participants got and length of time they spent on treadmill next day). Below is the feedback that I received for Hypothesizing Feedback for 5-1 Final Project Milestone Three: Hypothesizing Top of Form Submission Feedback Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis: You are definitely on the right track but we should state your Null and Alternative very specifically to your data set. So something like: Null: Seasonal temperature does not affect the age of onset of infants' crawling. Alternative: Seasonal temperature affects the age of onset of infants' crawling. Below is the feedback I received for my introduction. Could you please give me an appropriate introduction for the scenario I chose. Submission Feedback Introduction: Scenario: Provide a more detailed summary of the scenario that you chose. For example, the general research question, participants, study design should all be explained.I chose Scenario 1 (Child and Adolescent Development. This scenario talks about babies and when they begin to crawl. Please do the Analysis on Scenario 1. Bottom of Form

Describe in 500 words the disaster recovery plan and who is responsible  at your place of employment. Consider the critical business functions and your recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives.

Assignment # 1—Research Paper CritiqueHide Assignment InformationInstructionsPlease select any nursing research article from any one of the scientific journals found in the Nursing-Related Databases and Journals list. Select an article from an area that you are interested in or from the field you are working in. The article must be a peer-reviewed research report that was published in the last 5 years. Using the article selected, construct a critique of the article, 6 to 10 pages (including cover page and references).It is strongly recommended that you send your article via e-mail to the instructor for approval before your begin your critique.The critique shouldidentify the problem statement or statement of purpose of the articlecomment the on article’s literature review (usually found in the introduction or background sections)describe the participants being studied, stating inclusion and exclusion criteriadiscuss the sampling issues, such as probability or nonprobability and number of subjects usedidentify the study setting—where data collection occurreddiscuss informed consent—whether the participants were fully informed, how their consent was obtained, and any other ethical considerationsidentify the hypothesis or research questionidentify the research design—for example, experimental or nonexperimental; descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, or predictive?identify research variables, both independent and dependentdescribe how the study data were analyzed (what statistical measures were used)describe the results of the study and appropriateness of the methods used; include study limitationsaccurately comment on level of evidence used, nursing theory addressed (including if no theory is described) and implications for nursing practice or researchdiscuss how the research findings can be applied to the clinical areaYou must submit a pdf copy of the article that you are critiquing along with the assignment. The following resources, in the week 4 Learning Resources section of the LEO classroom, will provide helpful guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article.VideoFramework for how to read and critique a research study: Research Article Critique. ArticlesVance, D. E., Talley, M., Azuero, A., Pearce, P. F., & Christian, B. J. (2013). Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study: perspectives for doctoral students and other novice readers. Nursing: Research and Reviews, 3: 67–75.Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1): 38-43.The Learning Resources page lists resources that provide several guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article you may find helpful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your instructor.Start DateMar 18, 2019 12:00 AMDue DateApr 15, 2019 8:00 AMHide RubricsRubric Name: Assignment #1: Research Paper CritiqueThis table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaLevel 3Level 2Level 1Description of Study10 points(7-10 points)Provides clear, accurate comments on the title, abstract, introduction, and purpose of the study6 points(3 - 6 points) Provides comments on the title, abstract, introduction, or purpose of the study2 points (0-2 points)Lacks comments on the title, abstract, introduction, or purpose of the study/ 10Participants10 points(7-10 points)Discusses participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, consent, and other ethical considerations6 points(3-6 points)Includes information on participants, but lacks information regarding sample size and/or consent2 points(0-2 points)Provides little or no information regarding participants, sample size, or consent/ 10Research Question/hypothesis20 points(13 - 20 points)Accurately identifies research question/hypotheses, including independent and dependent variables12 points(6-12 points)May not accurately identify research question/hypotheses or independent and dependent variables5 points(0-5 points)Lacks discussion of research question/hypotheses and/or study variables/ 20Review, Methods & Results20 points(13-20 points)Accurately comments on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study12 points(6-12 points)Includes comments on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study, but discussion was somewhat vague5 points(0-5 points)Does not comment on literature review, research methods, data analyses, and limitations of the study; or inaccurately discusses these aspects/ 20Article Evaluation20 points(13-20 points)Accurately comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, and implications for nursing practice or research12 points(6-12 points)Comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, or implications for nursing practice or research5 points(0-5 points)Inaccurately comments on level of evidence used, nursing theory, or implications for nursing practice or research/ 20Application to the Clinical Area10 points(7-10 points)Discusses realistic applications of the research to the clinical area6 points(3-6 points)Discusses somewhat realistic applications of the research to the clinical area2 points(0-2 points)Does not discuss realistic applications of the research to the clinical area/ 10APA, Organization, Grammar & Spelling10 points(7-10 points)Expertly applies APA guidelines in formatting and referencing; exhibits excellent spelling and grammar throughout the paper; is well organized and easy to read6 points(3-6 points)Applies APA, but exhibits some formatting or referencing mistakes; has some spelling and grammar errors; is generally well written and easy to read, with minimal organization problems2 points(0-2 points)Has many APA, spelling, and/or grammar mistakes throughout the paper; is difficult to read; may be ineffectively organized/ 10Total/ 100Overall ScoreLevel 361 points minimumLevel 224 points minimumLevel 10 points minimum