Showing Page:
1/2
Question 1
Suspending the purchases of flooring from china as well as offering air screening for the
company’s customers were really good ideas. However, I believe that they inconvenienced their
customers; therefore, inconvenienced customers should have been compensated. The
compensation could either be free installation, discounted prices on products, and removal of old
flooring
Question 2
Yes, the government acted promptly on consumer benefits. However, it did very little to protect
damage already done. The government should put up government agencies to regulate consumer
companies and the citizens
Question 3
I am of the opinion that the government didn’t do enough. Formaldehyde use in flooring should
be banned in the United States and penalties set for the law breakers. The penalties from should
educate the public about the risk of using Formaldehyde use in flooring.
Question 4
The lawsuits will assist in solving the problem. The lawsuits has won the attention of the public
and government agencies/ authorities; therefore, bringing in more players and a watchful eye on
the company’s actions.
Question 5
The manufacturers are most responsible for consumer exposure to excess formaldehyde at levels.
The Chinese manufacturers are at fault for allowing emission of high level gaseous chemicals to
the atmosphere. Also, the manager is also at fault for putting up substandard goods on sale
Question 6
Showing Page:
2/2
The supplier and retailers are responsible because since they are the ones physically dealing with
the product being sold.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Question 1 Suspending the purchases of flooring from china as well as offering air screening for the company’s customers were really good ideas. However, I believe that they inconvenienced their customers; therefore, inconvenienced customers should have been compensated. The compensation could either be free installation, discounted prices on products, and removal of old flooring Question 2 Yes, the government acted promptly on consumer benefits. However, it did very little to protect damage already done. The government should put up government agencies to regulate consumer companies and the citizens Question 3 I am of the opinion that the government didn’t do enough. Formaldehyde use in flooring should be banned in the United States and penalties set for the law breakers. The penalties from should educate the public about the risk of using Formaldehyde use in flooring. Question 4 The lawsuits will assist in solving the problem. The lawsuits has won the attention of the public and government agencies/ authorities; therefore, bringing in more players and a watchful eye on the company’s actions. Question 5 The manufacturers are most responsible for consumer exposure to excess formaldehyde at levels. The Chinese manufacturers are at fault for allowing emission of high level gaseous chemicals to the atmosphere. Also, the manager is also at fault for putting up substandard goods on sale Question 6 The supplier and retailers are responsible because since they are the ones physically dealing with the product being sold. Name: Description: ...
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4