Homework Assignment: Analyzing the Credibility of Two WebsitesAnswer all questions completely. You should answer the questions in essay form, providing an ARGUMENT for why your "strong" website should be considered strong, and why your "weak" website should be considered weak.Your essay should be a minimum of 1000 words (about 4 typed double spaced pages in 12 point font with 1 inch margins), not including your "Works Cited" section at the end of your essay.Submit your essay as an attachment in any of the following formats, only: .pdf, .doc, .docx Your essay will be automatically checked through the "Turn It In" system, so make sure that you are responsibly citing your sources, including quotation marks around quoted material, and using your own words for any summarizing or paraphrasing.To complete this assignment, you need to have read through this module. The goal of this assignment is for you to demonstrate an ability to distinguish a website with strong credibility and one with weak credibility. ASSIGNMENT: Find two websites on the same topic, one of which has strong credibility and the other which has weak credibility. Answer the following questions about each of the websites. What is the topic of the website?Why is it important to establish credibility for this topic?How did you establish credibility for the website and the information provided? (Or, for the weak website, what is missing in establishing credibility?)Is there any opportunities for bias on the website? Explain.What is the goal of the website? Who is the target audience?On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being very weak, 10 being very strong), what numerical value would you assign to the credibility of the website? Briefly explain your answer.Provide a Works Cited area at the bottom of your essay, in MLA format, to indicate where you found the websites, and any other information pertaining to the websites. You must also cite your sources in the text of your essay, in MLA format.

Assignment: Constructing a Psychological Measure Constructing a useful psychological test is a meticulous process. First, you must formulate a clear, empirically based definition of what is to be measured and carefully consider the items and response formats that would best measure this construct. The test items are created based on a theory or by sampling a domain of knowledge. Subject matter experts are often called upon to generate and evaluate the initial test items. The test is then given to a large sample of people and, after careful analysis, the statistical properties of each item are scrutinized, and decisions are made about item retention, elimination, and revision. You will go through many of the steps in this process in this course. Your first assignment is to identify a construct of interest that you would like your proposed test to measure and start the process of developing a definition of the construct of interest. You should select a construct that is applicable to organizations (e.g., intelligence, personality, integrity).To prepare for this Assignment: Read the article, “Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development,” the section entitled “Scale Construction” in Methodological Issues & Strategies in Clinical Research, and the section entitled “Defining the Construct” in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences: Summated Rating Scale Construction.As you read the resources, focus on the steps for developing an operational definition of a psychological construct to be measured. Also, consider the importance of conducting a literature review to clearly articulate the definition of a construct and differentiate it from similar constructs.Read the chapter, “Taxonomies and Compendia of Cognitive Ability and Personality Constructs and Measures Relevant to Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology.” Review cognitive and personality constructs and their associated definitions.Identify a psychological construct of interest to you that you would like to focus on throughout the remainder of the course. The construct should be applicable to organizations.Conduct a brief literature review on the construct. Develop a working definition of the construct or adopt one based on what you researched and provide justification for it use.By Day 7Submit a 1-page paper (not including references) that addresses the following:Identify the construct of interest* that you would like to focus on for the remainder of the course.Provide an initial draft of an operational definition of the construct. Be sure to include cited evidence from the empirical literature that helped you create an operational definition of this construct.* This construct will be used in future weeks as you work through the measurement development process. You are strongly encouraged to spend time reviewing the academic literature on this construct now, which will help you complete the assignments in future weeks. If you are a doctoral student and you have a construct or measure in mind for your dissertation research, you may use this assignment, and those that follow in the remaining weeks, as an opportunity to begin exploring the construct or measure. Doing so may also help you later prepare for your dissertation.Note: Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.