Scenario (fictional):Artificial Intelligence Medical (i.e., AIM) Inc. is a very profitable new company. Although it has only been in business for two years, it has already doubled the size of its workforce and quadrupled its profits. The CEO/founder has stepped aside recently in favor of a new CEO in the wake of employees’ frustration and social media messages about the benefits inequity and lack of motivation for teams at the company. The new CEO wants to change the way executive salaries are determined and find ways to motivate the project teams. The project teams typically are assigned to an artificial intelligence product such as a robot to perform routine surgeries or diagnostic software used by different medical units of a hospital for patient diagnosis.The new CEO has tasked your team of employees with determining a general proposed solution to the inequity in pay at the company and to address the lack of motivation for the 125 technicians and medical staff that work in project teams of 25 employees each. Each technician or staff member receives a salary of $35,000 per year while the CEO and V.P.s receive $500,000 per year (the CEO also holds 10% of the company stock) and the managers receive $50,000 per year. There is a CEO, 2 VPs (Manufacturing and Finance), a Marketing Manager, a Sales/Customer Service Manager, and a Technical Support Manager along with the 125 technology-savvy employees working at the company.Describe the tasks necessary to realize a successful response to the new CEO, allocating tasks for each member.THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A WRITTEN PAPER. I JUST NEED A SHORT LIST WITH BULLET POINTS DESCRIBING THE TASKS.

Goal: The student will interview someone from a different culture. You will create a power point presentation of your findings.Content Requirements for this assignment:For this assignment, you will Interview a client whose culture is different from yours. The client can be a patient, neighbor, grandparent, in-law, or friend. Do not use your parent, brother, sister, spouse, or significant other. This interview is the basis of your paper. Use the Organizing Framework (12 boxes in Chapter 2) to guide your interview.Interview your selected person on three or four domains of the model. Complete a literature review of the cultural group from which your interviewee comes. Compare and contrast data obtained from your interview with what you find in the literature. Provide at least two recommendations for clinical practice, two recommendations for research, and two recommendations for the health-care organization on this cultural group; be specific in your recommendations. Value of this exercise to your current or future practice.Submission Instructions:Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style. Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Power point presentation with 8 -10 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide.The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Presentation RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues/Problems4 pointsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3 pointsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2 pointsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1 pointPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.4 pointsAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems4 pointsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3 pointsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2 pointsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1 pointPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.4 pointsDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding4 pointsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3 pointsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2 pointsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1 pointPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.4 pointsUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature4 pointsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3 pointsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2 pointsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1 pointPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.4 pointsWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes Speaker's Notes and the assigned Number of Slides4 pointsDistinguishedDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3 pointsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2 pointsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1 pointPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.4 pointsTotal Points: 20RubricPresentation RubricPresentation RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems4.0 PtsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3.0 PtsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2.0 PtsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1.0 PtsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms4.0 PtsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3.0 PtsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2.0 PtsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1.0 PtsPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding4.0 PtsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3.0 PtsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2.0 PtsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1.0 PtsPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature4.0 PtsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3.0 PtsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2.0 PtsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1.0 PtsPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes speaker's notes and the assigned number of slides.4.0 PtsFull MarksDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3.0 PtsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2.0 PtsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1.0 PtsPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.4.0 pts

read and follow the instructions in the word document. make sure to use the correct book, i provided the ISBN at the bottom of the document.