JUS212 Grand Canyon University Restorative Justice Essay
Restorative Justice Essay AssignmentInstructionsWrite an essay of 500-750 words,Evaluate the merits of restorative justice programs by doing the following:Use the GCU Library to locate 3 to 5 relevant sources in support of your content, no older than 5 years,Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.Locate and describe a restorative justice program that is currently in use by a justice agency (Content 1),Use research sources to explain how effective this type of program is (Content 1),Explain if you feel the benefits outweigh the costs, and why (Content 2),RubricContent 1: 35%Content 2: 30%Minimum 3 Resources: 15%Mechanics: 9%Paragraph Development and Transitions: 8%Paper Formatting: 1%Citations: 2%Required Sub-HeadingsRestorative Justice ProgramDefine restorative justice, provide how it applies or is utilized in a justice program for drug courts, to victim’s rights or domestic violence, and explain whether it seems to be effective.Determine whether the program’s benefit outweighs the costs to the community.You are not required to have a cover page.Do not write an introduction or conclusion. Also, do not write an abstract.Always page break the reference page.Do you use apostrophe words like shouldn’t, couldn’t, etc. These words are considered informal and should not be used in an academic paper. Write out should not, could not, etc. Equals more word count too.Never write in the 1st person in an academic paper unless the instructions tell you to do so. These instructions do not.Don’t share your feelings. Academic papers are about research and analysis, not about nebulous feelings and emotions.If you have a sub-heading, you should have a citation to support that sub-heading.Always define your subject. Here, the subject is restorative justice. Define the subject with a citation. Remember that also eats up word count.Cost Benefit AnalysisPotential Citations – Drug CourtD’Anca, A., & Fagan, E. (2016). Drug Courts and Catholic Social Teaching: Challenges for a Retributive Age. Catholic Social Science Review, 21, 117–136. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=118270047&site=eds-live&scope=siteDutmers, J. M. (2017). Campus Drug Courts: How Universities May Be Best Equipped to Tackle Crime and Substance Abuse in Young Adults. Law & Psychology Review, 41, 191–207. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=124410832&site=eds-live&scope=siteHueston, J. (2016). Exporting Drug-Court Concepts to Traditional Courts: A Roadmap to an Effective Therapeutic Court. Court Review, 52, 44. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edslex&AN=edslex15C5A9B9&site=eds-live&scope=siteRussell, R. T. (2015). Veterans Treatment Courts. Touro Law Review, 31(3), 385–401. Retrieved fromhttps://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=110470716&site=eds-live&scope=siteSkordas, G. G. (2015). Utah’s Drug Court. Utah Bar Journal, 28(5), 26–30. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=109924920&site=eds-live&scope=sitePotential Citations – Victim’s RightsJoyce-Wojtas, N., & Keenan, M. (2016). Is restorative justice for sexual crime compatible with various criminal justice systems? Contemporary Justice Review, 19(1), 43–68.https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/10282580.2015.1101689Paul, G. D., & Schenck, H. W. J. (2017). Beliefs about Victim-Offender Conferences: Factors Influencing Victim-Offender Engagement. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(1), 47–72.https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/crq.21190Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D. J., & Ariel, B. (2015). Are restorative justice conferences effective in reducing repeat offending? Findings from a Campbell systematic review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 1–24.https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9222-9Werkneh, M. (2017). Retaking Mecca: Healing Harlem through Restorative Just Compensation. Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 51(2), 225–273. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=128857397&site=eds-live&scope=sitePotential Citations – Domestic ViolenceElias, R. (2015). Restorative Justice in Domestic Violence Cases. DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 9(1), 67–84. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=114837414&site=eds-live&scope=siteJohnsen, P., & Robertson, E. (n.d.). Protecting, Restoring, Improving: Incorporating Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Restorative Justice Concepts into Civil Domestic Violence Cases. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 164(6), 1557–1586. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000382101800006&site=eds-live&scope=siteHopkins, C. Q. (2012). Tempering Idealism with Realism: Using Restorative Justice Processes to Promote Acceptance of Responsibility in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 35(2), 311–355. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=79318482&site=eds-live&scope=siteRandall, M. (2013). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence? From Vaguely Hostile Skeptic to Cautious Convert: Why Feminists Should Critically Engage with Restorative Approaches to Law. Dalhousie Law Journal, 36, 461. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edslex&AN=edslex508D11C4&site=eds-live&scope=siteYou are not required to have a cover page. Do not write an introduction or conclusion. Also, do not write an abstract. Always page break the reference page. Do you use apostrophe words like shouldn’t, couldn’t, etc. These words are considered informal and should not be used in an academic paper. Write out should not, could not, etc. Equals more word count too. Never write in the 1st person in an academic paper unless the instructions tell you to do so. These instructions do not. Don’t share your feelings. Academic papers are about research and analysis, not about nebulous feelings and emotions. If you have a sub-heading, you should have a citation to support that sub-heading. Always define your subject. Here, the subject is restorative justice. Define the subject with a citation. Remember that also eats up word count.