Assignment ContentImagine your leadership team at the long-term care facility has identified mentoring and mentorship as a key initiative for the organization. They want your management team to develop a plan for a new mentorship program. Your team has been charged with developing a Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation to guide the new mentors.Create a 10- to 14-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes MIN 100 WORDS in which you:Identify the mission and vision of the program.Purpose of the programMentor and mentee goalsAnalyze the preferred leadership style of a mentor.Determine how personal leadership philosophy influences your mentoring style. Create an action plan.How would you present the program to the new mentors?What possible challenges will mentors and mentees face during the program?What resources are available to the mentors and mentees?How will you receive and implement feedback for the program?Identify specific measures you will use to determine if the mentorship program is successful.Cite 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references according to APA guidelines.Include a title slide, detailed speaker notes, and a references slide.

Option #2: Stock or Bond: The Investor PerspectiveInvestors who buy stock (equity) are owners in a company, investors who buy bonds (debt) are creditors of a company. Using the information and terminology in this module and research you complete on your own, determine the pros and cons for an investor to buy bonds and stocks. Assess the following components:AdvantagesDisadvantagesPotential for EarningsRiskAccess to fundsTax implicationsRequirements:Submit your 3 to 4 page paper in a Word document. Use terms, and concepts from class readings and your own research through the CSU-G library.Cite at least 4 references with at least 2 being scholarly/peer reviewed articles. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.).Review the Module 5 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.RubricFIN300 Mod 5 CTFIN300 Mod 5 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 85.0