Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor.Read and Critique the following article:Harris, M. F., Chan, B. C., Laws, R. A., Williams, A. M., Davies, G. P., Jayasinghe, U. W., … Milat, A. (2013). The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial). BMC Public Health, 13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-375In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), evaluate the study according to research design methods, procedures and study results, for example, see Evaluating a quantitative study (Houser, 2018, p. 345 & p. 377), Include a discussion on how the study contributes to evidence-based practice (EBP).PLEASE REFERENCE THIS BOOK FOR THE ASSIGNMENT ((((VERY IMPORTANT))))https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CxL4Q4rhX8iOz6YqR_KBQyfguaG8AemzPlease remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page, body of the paper, and reference page. Use the rubric below to help you complete your assignment.Rubric or Grading Criteria: Competency28 points21 points14 points0 pointsTotalEvaluates research designEvaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser 2018, p. 345). Evaluates research design of study using most (75%)components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). Evaluates research design of study using some (50%)components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). No paper submitted or content missing less than 25% of the components evaluated /28Evaluates methods/procedures and results Evaluates methods/procedure, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser 2018, p.377). Evaluates methods/procedure and results of the study using most (75%) components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). Evaluates methods/procedures and results of the study using some (50%) components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018). No paper submitted or content missing less than 25% of the components evaluated /28Clinical practice implicationsDiscusses how the study contributes to EBP and clinical practiceDiscusses EBP in general but not how the study contributes to EBP. Discusses research and evidence but not clinical implications in practiceNo paper submitted or content missing /28Competency7 points5 points2.5 points0 pointsAPA formatDemonstrates competent use of mechanics and APAMinimal APA errorsTwo unique errors i.e. abbreviations and in text citationMany APA errorsMore than two APA errorsComplete lack of understanding APA format /7Competency3 points2 points1 points0 pointsOrganizationOrganization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good supportOrganization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitionsOrganization does not meet requirements /3GrammarGrammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American EnglishGrammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understandingGrammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understandingGrammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding /3ReferencesReferences are relevant, authoritative and contemporaryAdequate referencesMinimal use of appropriate referencesPoor use and/or selection of references not relevant /3Total Possible = /100

The Ethics of CodingBy the due date assigned, respond to the discussion prompt using the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Support your answer with examples and research. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic. They should be your own, original and free from plagiarism. Follow APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.Suppose your supervisor asks you to create a report that lists all employees sorted by salary. Suppose you also know that your employer will use this report to lay off the highest-paid employee in each department. Would you agree to write the program? Instead, what if the report's purpose was to list the worst performer in each department in terms of sales? What if the report grouped employees by gender? What if the report grouped employees by race? Suppose your supervisor asks you to sort employees by the dollar value of medical insurance claims they have in a year, and you fear the employer will use the report to eliminate workers who are driving up the organization's medical insurance costs. Do you agree to write the program even if you know that the purpose of the report is to eliminate workers?

Discussion topic--- in your own words, no cut and paste allowed.1---Explain the importance of random sampling. What problems/limitations could prevent a truly random sampling and how can they be prevented? What is the most important topic you learned from this discussion?2----Explain each sampling technique discussed in the "Visual Learner: Statistics" in your own words and give examples of when each technique would be appropriate. What is the most important topic you learned from this discussion?