Access over 20 million homework & study documents

A literary analysis of bartleby s the scrivener by herman melville

Content type
User Generated
Rating
Showing Page:
1/4
1
Student's Name
Lecturer' Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
A literary analysis of Bartleby's the Scrivener by Herman Melville
Bartleby the Scrivener was written in 1853. At the time, transition and industrialization
began changing the public attitude towards work. The author made light of this change and the
effect on society with the characters of Bartleby. He uses symbolism, plot, and setting to
demonstrate the narrator and Bartleby's unwillingness and ultimate failure to adapt. The story
emphasizes mainly the narrator's relationship with his workers through the extended set up that
precedes the introduction of Bartleby. The narrative simultaneously supports the reader's
inclination to identify with the narrator and judge him for not acting more forcefully towards his
workers. In some way, it makes the reader feel, uncomfortably, their collaboration with market
capitalism forces. The story appears to caution against any easy form of condescension or
sympathy.
The narrator characterizes himself as an extremely safe man who looks for the simplest
way of life. The characterization explains the lack of response to his employees at his workplace.
For instance, Turkey, who is drunk every afternoon, Nippers cannot work well during the morning,
and Ginger merely serves as an errand boy. The speaker seems to avoid confrontation and conflict
and is more willing to overlook his employees' periods of shoddy work. In the story, John Jacob
Astor is the richest man in the US during the 1840s, and the narrator focuses his attention on him.
John is often associated with the brutal drive for wealth. The speaker further digresses to protest

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4
2
the abolition of the master of Chancery, a position that needs no much work as pleasant and
remunerative. The position oversaw settling issues in courts over estates. Therefore, this
emphasizes the narrator's role within legal proceedings involving wealth and property. However
much the narrator is concerned with living with ease, he is much interested in property and wealth.
He also wants to see himself as superior to his employees as well as their fellow workers.
The narrator's lawyer finds Bartleby's character quite helpful, compared to the other
peculiar workers. Business went on as usual even after the arrival of Bartleby. However, when the
lawyer called Bartleby to examine all the copies for accuracy examination, his reply was, "I would
prefer not to" (Melville, pp. 3-34). The lawyer is surprised and chose not to respond. All copyists
are lined up to examine the large documents that needed to be reviewed, and the lawyer decides to
call Bartleby again, who answered the same way as he did earlier. Even with the smallest favor
from the narrator, Bartleby "prefers not to" examine the paper. Bartleby ended up not operational
at all, and the speaker finds a motive to fire him. However, Bartleby chooses to continue living in
the building. The narrator cannot get rid of Bartleby and decides to move all the office equipment
to another facility. However, Bartleby chose to continue living in the narrator's old office. Bartleby
seems to be a very stubborn character. The speaker uses an impractical way is taking Bartleby to
prison to solve the issue.
Melville characterizes the narrator as a man driven by contrary desires before Bartleby is
even introduced. He has a big desire to maintain and obtain wealth at odds with his willingness to
ease. Bartleby also has an urge to be recognized as superior in tension with his need to see himself
as sympathetic and not an autocrat. The narrator's response to Bartleby, with whose initial work
he would "have been quite delighted…. had he been cheerfully industrious", give the impression
that the narrator needs more than just a good worker; he needs an employee who seems to be happy

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1 Student's Name Lecturer' Name Institutional Affiliation Date A literary analysis of Bartleby's the Scrivener by Herman Melville Bartleby the Scrivener was written in 1853. At the time, transition and industrialization began changing the public attitude towards work. The author made light of this change and the effect on society with the characters of Bartleby. He uses symbolism, plot, and setting to demonstrate the narrator and Bartleby's unwillingness and ultimate failure to adapt. The story emphasizes mainly the narrator's relationship with his workers through the extended set up that precedes the introduction of Bartleby. The narrative simultaneously supports the reader's inclination to identify with the narrator and judge him for not acting more forcefully towards his workers. In some way, it makes the reader feel, uncomfortably, their collaboration with market capitalism forces. The story appears to caution against any easy form of condescension or sympathy. The narrator characterizes himself as an extremely safe man who looks for the simplest way of life. The characterization explains the lack of response to his employees at his workplace. For instance, Turkey, who is drunk ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4