Unit 3 Assignment 2 - Planning for EHRSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 40 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructionsReview the information provided for an example EHR implementation, including each activity's duration and predecessor(s):ActivityDuration (days)PredecessorACreate the EHR vision5-BIdentify the planning horizon10ACObtain buy-in from affected parties30BDDevelop a financing and acquisition strategy10CEDevelop functional, data, and technical strategies45CFConduct vendor selection45D, EGPlan the EHR implementation15C, E, FHConduct benefits realization study10A-HDraw the PERT or GANTT chart for this implementation based on the information provided.Indicate the critical path on the PERT or GANTT chart.Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.Cite all sources in APA format.Submit your PERT or GANTT chart for grading. Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box. RubricUnit 3 Assignment 2 - Planning for EHRUnit 3 Assignment 2 - Planning for EHRCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.18.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.16.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.14.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.12.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P10.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.9.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.8.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.7.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.6.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNext

I will be attaching my paper on the advocacy group but I need more detailed work and make it three pages in summary. Fine tuning in detail of how this group will be. Think of how this group will be in the future? Medical marjunia introduction to these population as well providing one to one client based, etc...In this unit, you will communicate a healthcare advocacy plan. You will contact either a local healthcare agency (i.e., County Health Department, etc.) or healthcare facility (i.e., clinic, hospital, or nursing home) to research two to three healthcare issues affecting the local community.Explain the issues facing your community, possible methods to alleviate the concern, and how you would ethically advocate for the respective population. You are required to research the specific issues presented with credible sources (e.g., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health, Census Bureau, etc.). In a 3-page paper, present a healthcare advocacy plan that addresses your research findings. Provide a summary of your findings, including at least three (3) credible references to support your advocacy plan in APA format.Requirements:Research two to three healthcare issues affecting your local community.Propose a healthcare advocacy plan that addresses your research findings.Include three (3) academic references.