This week, our discussion thread is centered on the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and clarifying capabilities. Select a Saudi Arabian company with which you are familiar and reinforce the approach to resource and capability analysis by appraising the strategic worth of key resources and capabilities using Barney’s VRIO (Valuable, Rare, Imitable, Organization) Framework (See Strategy Capsule 5.6). Identify three key resources and/or capabilities of the company.Vet each of the three against the VRIO (Valuable, Rare, Imitable, Organization) Framework.Explain each resource/capability’s score given the VRIO rubric. For instance, does the resource/capability impart sufficient value, is the resource/capability rare, etc.What is the likely competitive outcome for each resource/capability? That is, given its VRIO score is it likely to impart a sustainable competitive advantage, a temporary competitive advantage, competitive parity, or competitive disadvantage?Make recommendations to the firm’s management as to which of the resources/capabilities you have identified should be invested (built up), divested and/or which additional resources should be acquired to supplement/leverage existing resources/capabilities.In your response to student posts, focus on the viability of the suggestions made by other students: To which degree do these suggestions make sense regarding the possibility of gaining a sustainable competitive advantage? Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required. Required Chapter 5 in Contemporary Strategy Analysis Chapter 5 PowerPoint slides in Contemporary Strategy Analysis Álvarez-Melgarejo, M., & Torres-Barreto, M. (2018). Can resources act as capabilities foundations? A bibliometric analysis. UIS Ingenierías, 17(2), 185–200. Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2017). The governance of global value chains: Unresolved human rights, environmental and ethical dilemmas in the Apple supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 111–131. Recommended Shan, S., Luo, Y., Zhou, Y., & Wei, Y. (2019). Big data analysis adaptation and enterprises’ competitive advantages: The perspective of dynamic capability and resource-based theories. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(4), 406–420. Course Materials Required: Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary strategy analysis (10th ed.) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 9781119495727

This assessment has three-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this assessment.Part I: Systems and Constraints Analysis of an OrganizationDevelop robust systems diagrams that capture the system behaviors and outcomes for your client’s organization. Include a 5-Whys “effect-cause-effect” analysis and a causal loop diagram (CLD) that identifies appropriate system constraints and delays and that also identifies the key system archetypes described in the case. (1 page for the 5-Whys diagram, 1 page for the CLD)Write a persuasive, prioritized description of your findings and recommendations that integrates the analyses you have performed. (3–4 pages)Part II: Executive SummaryWrite a brief executive summary description of your prioritized findings and recommendations. (1 page)Part III: Presentation of RecommendationsCreate a presentation that lists your key findings (Slide 1) and relevant recommendations (Slide 2).

Discussion1Discuss how Christian health administrators can use the biblical concept of stewardship to produce quality outcomes.Requirements: 250 words minimum initial post, 100 words minimum replyDiscussion 2Prompt: Discuss whether some health organizations are exempt from quality improvement initiatives because they provide basic, minimal services.Requirements: 250 words minimum initial post, 100 words minimum reply