After the Civil War, the United States had to recover from war, handle western expansion, and grapple with very new economic forms. However, its greatest issues would revolve around the legacies of slavery and increasing diversity in the decades after the Civil War. Reconstruction was partly a period of military occupation of the south by the northern victors. Former slaves now had freedom and new opportunities but faced old prejudices and rapidly forming new barriers. Immigrants from Europe and Asia came in large numbers but then faced political and social restrictions. Women continued to seek rights. Yet, on the whole, America became increasingly diverse by the 1920s. Consider developments, policies, and laws in that period from 1865 to the 1920s. Take one of the positions as suggested below, draw from the sources listed, and present a paper with specific examples and arguments to demonstrate the validity of your position.Possible position—in each case you can take the pro or con position: The Lost Cause narrative of the South effectively sabotaged and influenced racial policy in the US for most of the post-Civil War period. (or you can take the position that it did not) Political policies in the decades after the Civil War generally promoted diversity and “the melting pot” despite the strong prejudices of a few. (or you can take the position that political policies did not) Reform movements between 1865 and 1930, like the Progressives and the agrarian populists, generally led the way to increased democracy. (or you can take the position that these movements did not) After giving general consideration to your readings so far and any general research, select one of the positions above as your position—your thesis. (Sometimes after doing more thorough research, you might choose the reverse position. This happens with critical thinking and inquiry. Your final paper might end up taking a different position than you originally envisioned.). Organize your paper as follows, handling these issues: The position you choose (from the list above)—or something close to it—will be the thesis statement in your opening paragraph. To support your position, use three specific examples from different decades between 1865 and 1930. You may narrowly focus on race or gender or immigrant status, or you may use examples relevant to all categories. Explain why the opposing view is weak in comparison to yours. Consider your life today: In what way does the history you have shown shape or impact issues in your workplace or desired profession? Length: The paper should be 500-to-750 words in length. This normally means 3-to-4 pages for the body of the paper. (The title page and References page do not count in these calculations.) Double-space between lines. Format instructions are below.Top Research and References: You must use a MINIMUM of three sources; the Schultz textbook must be one of them. Your other two sources should be drawn from the list provided below. This is guided research, not open-ended Googling. You will have an alphabetized list of Reference entries at the end, using APA format. You will have short, APA-style in-text citations appropriately placed in the body of the paper; these in-text citations will match the References listed at the end. Except as your instructor might direct, don’t use other sources for your paper than those listed here. (Of course, for “starter research” you can read many sources.)Top Source List for Assignment 1: Be sure to use the Schultz text as a source. Use at least two of the other sources listed here. Some sources are “primary” sources from the time period being studied. Some sources below can be accessed via direct link or through the primary sources link on Blackboard. Each week has a different list of primary sources. For others, they are accessible through the Library tab to the left of the screen in Blackboard—once in there, you may do a “keyword” search of the article title. APA Reference for the textbook - Schultz, Kevin M. (2018). HIST5: Volume 2: U.S. History Since 1865 (Student edition). Boston: Cengage. Choose sources relevant to the topic and position you are taking: Abu-Laban, Y., & Lamont, V. (1997). Crossing borders: Interdisciplinary, immigration and the melting pot in the American cultural imaginary. Canadian Review of American Studies, 27(2), 23-43. Black Testimony on the aftermath of enslavement. (1866). Report of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction. Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Chinese Exclusion Act. (1882). Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Davis, J. C. Bancroft. (1896). Plessy vs. Ferguson. Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Fitzgerald, M. W. (2018, Jan.). Terrorism and racial coexistence in Alabama’s Reconstruction. Alabama Review, 71(1), 7-24. [accessible through Library tab; keyword search the article title; get the .pdf file of the article] Foster, G. M. (2002, Feb. 24). The Lost Cause. Shotgun’s Home of the Civil War. Retrieved from http://www.civilwarhome.com/lostcause.htm Harjo, S. S. (1996). Now and then: native peoples in the United States. Dissent (00123846). Meacham, J. (2017). Our historical ambivalence about immigrants is a great American paradox. Time, 189(5), 23. The Lost Cause. Civil War Journeys. Retrieved from http://civil-war-journeys.org/the_lost_cause.htm Mississippi Black code. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/recon/code.html Moody, W. G. (1883). Bonanza Farming and its impact. Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Parsons, E. F. (2011, Feb.). Klan Skepticism and denial in Reconstruction-Era public discourse. Journal of Southern History, 77(1), 53-90. [accessible through Library tab; keyword search the article title; get the .pdf file of the article] Populist Party Platform. (1896). Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Schultz, Kevin M. (2014) HIST: Volume 2: U.S. history since 1865 (3rd ed.). University of Illinois at Chicago: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Sinclair, Upton. (1906). Attack on the Meatpackers. Retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811... Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced between lines, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. A template for this paper is here. This is optional. The paper must be submitted (uploaded and attached) in the course shell provided online.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Identify and discuss the different ways that the heritage of slavery, the Civil War, Reconstruction, and segregation have shaped America’s history. Specify ways that women and minorities have responded to challenges and made contributions to American culture. Summarize and discuss the ways that formal policies of government have influenced the direction of historical and social development in the United States. Recognize the major turning points in American history since the Civil War. Use technology and information resources to research issues in contemporary U.S. history. Write clearly and concisely about contemporary U.S. history using proper writing mechanics.

Respond to two colleagues in one of the following ways: (Use sub-headings in response and please ask a question for further discussion to happen and have at least 2 APA reference) Compare your TEST results or other aspects of your post with your colleague’s responses. Provide suggestions for how your colleague could connect their theoretical orientation to future courses, in the discipline, and/or in practice. Share an insight you learned from another colleague in this Discussion or from earlier in the course. Response to Stormey The Theoretical Evaluation Self-Test (TEST) My Results Psychodynamic: 30 Biological: 15 Family: 23 Ecosystems: 27 Cognitive: 33 Pragmatic: 28 Humanistic: 16 Explain the extent to which you were surprised or not surprised by the TEST results and explain the reasons why you were surprised or not surprised. I was not surprised by my results. I scored highest in Cognitive, due to my beliefs in Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory. I truly believe that this theory explains how a child constructs a mental model of the world, and that development is a process which occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment. Identify the top three theories or models that most appealed to you. The top three theories that most appealed to me are: Cognitive Behavioral Theory, Empowerment Theory, and Resiliency Theory. Explain how your personal values, worldwide views, life experiences, and/or your personality influenced your selection of the top three theories or models. Cognitive Behavioral Theory: I like Cognitive Behavioral Theory because it is a goal-oriented psychotherapy treatment that takes a hands-on and practical approach to problem-solving. My experience with CBT is that when people change their patterns of thinking and/or behavior, this will change the way they feel. Empowerment Theory: I know when people are empowered, they have the ability to do amazing things. I have used empowerment with client’s and for myself, and when someone is empowered it is easier to realize their strengths and understand that they have the ability to change the situation. Resiliency Theory: I believe that people have the ability to maintain resilience in the face of adversity. As a social worker, I will assist and empower my clients to develop positive self-esteem, strong coping skills, and be self-efficient. I will encourage them to be optimistic, connect them with strong social resources, help develop adaptability, decrease their fear of failure, increase determination, and perseverance, and develop a high tolerance of uncertainty. In this course, you were asked to select one case study to use throughout the entire course. Describe this experience, what you learned, what could perhaps be done differently. Throughout this course, I used the case of Helen Petrakis. I really enjoyed “working” with Helen and applying different theories to her case. This allowed me to see what theories worked best for her and what theories to stay away from. Using one case throughout the course provided me with a real-world experience. In practice I may work with a client who has several issues and I may have to apply different theories and models to see what one works for the client to best help him/her. I choose Helen because I can relate to Helen (I am Helen), at times life gets so overwhelming that I feel as though I am inadequate and cannot handle all my responsibilities. As I applied different theories to Helen, I applied them to my life and I must say that I gained a lot of insight about myself and how capable I truly am. I do not think anything could have been done differently in part of a two-way communication between myself and “Helen”. Overall, I believe I effectively helped Helen overcome her obstacles and successfully prepared her for the road ahead. Resources: Coleman, D. (2004). The Theoretical Evaluation Self-Test (TEST): A Preliminary Validation Study. Social Work Research 28(2), 117-128. Cowan, P. A., Langer, J., Rich, J. H., & Nathanson, M. (1969). SOCIAL LEARNING AND PIAGET'S COGNITIVE THEORY OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT. Journal Of Personality & Social Psychology, 11(3), 261-274. Janet, L. (2014). Conceptual Frameworks and Research Models on Resilience in Leadership. SAGE Open, Vol 4, Iss 3 (2014), (3), doi:10.1177/215824401454546 Perkins, D. D. and Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology; Vol. 23; No.5, pg. 569 Response to Lucy INTERPRETING YOUR RESULTS SUBSCALE YOUR SCORE SAMPLE OF 130 mean (SD) Psychodynamic 26.2 (5.2) Biological 14.6 (4.0) Family 18.2 (4.0) Ecosystems 24.2 (2.6) Cognitive 25 (4.5) Pragmatic 20.1 (5.7) Humanistic 10.4 (2.4) Explain in 2 to 3 sentence the extent to which you were surprised or not surprised by the TEST results and explain the reasons why you were surprised or not surprised. I was not that surprise about my results. I was surprised by the score of the humanistic value. I can relate to Pruitt when he states that “the strategies I believed in most were what I was most comfortable offering to my clients (e.g., self-care using your support system). My general lack of a theoretical orientation, however, did not leave me well prepared to handle more severe problems like personality disorders, eating disorders, or substance abuse” (Pruitt 2014). I focused on small changes while working with homeless veterans. Identify the top three theories or models that most appealed to you. The top three theories that appealed to me were Cognitive Behavioral Theory, Role Theory and Solution Focused therapy and Mindfulness. I like Cognitive Behavioral was more in line with my personality and values. I enjoy seeing the veterans I work with make changes to their lives for the better. I believe that CBT can be coupled with other models. I really like the Role Theory because it put the client’s roles that impact their lives in perspective, it shows the social worker and client what expectations are expected of them for each role. I really like coupling CBT and Solution Focused therapy, I have used Solution Focused therapy and did not realized that I was using it. I participated in a workshop where Mindfulness was the focus, I have not used it in my practice but I look forward to using it in the future. Explain in 3 to 4 sentences how your personal values, worldviews, life experiences, and/or your personality influenced your selection of the top three theories or models. My top three are in line with my personality and values. The theories selected especially the CBT and solution focus allows the client to be the expert and the driver in therapy. My personality is that I learn from others and these theories and models allow me to listen to the client and learn from them what is important to them. I believe the client will be successful if they are provided the opportunity to be the driver in their therapy. If I was in therapy I would like for the therapist and myself to work together and for them to listen to me and help me to be successful in reaching my goals and making my life better. In this course, you were asked to select one case study to use throughout the entire course. Describe this experience—for example, the degree to which it was helpful to focus on one case, what you learned, what could perhaps be done differently I really enjoyed having one case study to use throughout the course because I was able to focus on the case and apply the theories as I would if it was a real case study. I worked with veterans with PTSD as an LPN and then I went back to school to earn my BSW, I work with homeless veterans that had PTSD, mental health issues and substance abuse issues, this case study helped me learn different strategies to apply to my practice. I have learned a lot and I am so grateful to my colleagues and Dr. C. I am proud of the work we have done and I will carry it in the next phase and especially in my practice. I really don’t feel that anything different should have been done. The feedback really helped me in my course work, with the feedback it let me know exactly what was expected and it kept me focused. The assignments were very interesting, I was able to do things that I have not done before such as doing a power point with narration or filming myself talking about my case. I have nothing but good things to say about this class. Thank you all and Dr. C for giving me a positive experience. Pruitt, N. T. (2014). From dodo bird to mindfulness: The effect of theoretical orientation on work and self. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(8), 753-759. Retrieved from Walden Library databases.