You can write about either defense or prosecution... i attach the case below..and n this assignment, you will be introduced to what is required to defend and prosecute a case. Your team will divide into 2 groups to present the prosecution and defense arguments for a case. Work together in your group to come to a consensus for your side. Take this opportunity to imagine yourself in the place of the defense or prosecution.You continue to excel as the newest paralegal in your law firm. Your next task is to organize a modified mock trial to assist the lawyers in preparing for the pending trial.Separate the team into 2 groups. One group will represent the defense and the other group will represent the prosecution.Review the State v. Stu Dents Court Case document to develop your arguments.Write a 250 words paper that includes each side’s arguments.Defense group, address the following as you write your arguments:Define types of homicide and corpus delicti. How is this related to the case?Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not?Distinguish between competency to stand trial and an insanity defense.What is required in your state for an insanity defense?What steps must be taken to prove insanity?Prosecution group, address the following as you write your arguments:List the elements of each crime and the facts that establish each element.Provide a specific state law for each charge and identify the state where that law is effective. Each group member's state needs to be represented.Include the state where your case would be the strongest.

In hiring a prospective employee, there are legitimate reasons for not hiring someone. For example, the prospective employee may not meet legal requirements (i.e., he or she is a minor and cannot complete the tasks of the job based on the young age) or positional requirements (i.e., he or she does not have the required experience or education for the position and the employer demonstrates this requirement as a business necessity).Neither of these examples is discrimination. However, there are protected classes that cannot be discriminated against. Title VII provides five protected classes that cannot be discriminated against. For review of the protected classes, see page IV of this week’s module. However, Title VII only applies to companies with 15 employees or more.Further, the bona fide occupational qualification (“BFOQ”) can be argued as a reason for discrimination by the employer, even of the protected classes. Importantly, though, is that race and color (two of the five protected classes under Title VII) are not on the list of permissible BFOQs.For this assignment, complete the following:Using the internet, research a case where an individual claimed discrimination, either in his or her hiring or firing, and the employer argued a permissible BFOQ was the reason behind the failure to hire or behind the firing.Identify and clearly define the relevant law utilized by the court in determining the outcome of the case. This includes defining applicable legal doctrine, provisions of a law, or elements of a specific cause of action.Apply facts from the researched situation to the applicable law, doctrine or cause of action researched.Then, address the following:Should Title VII apply to every company, regardless of number of employees?Should race and color be permissible bona fide occupational qualifications or should the BFOQ exceptions to employment discrimination be removed completely?In answering these questions, be sure to consider the effect on the business world and on society generally. Clearly summarize lessons learned from the week as they apply to your researched case. Identify new thoughts or ideas based on the module information and identify any related ethical issues.Your paper should be 2-3 pages in length, not including the title or references page. Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Course Information page, and make sure to follow the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.