Access over 20 million homework & study documents

search

Lenn Goodman arguments and examples of Some Moral Minima

Subject

Economics

Type

Study Guide

Rating

Showing Page:
1/3
Depending on different sociology composition, morality has been a problem that many societies
internationally have been attempting to deal. This term is utilized to describe the program of
acceptable behaviors within a given situation or community. However, moral minima are a word
which goes hand to hand along with the morality. This essentially models a standard or the belief
by which the people of a society need to follow, so they may be regarded as operating inside the
limitations of proper meaningful conduct. The creation of evolution has given space to diverse
forms, which moral minima may be produced. Therefore, morality is becoming an issue, which
is discussed in different methods depending on a way where one looks or examines this.
(Goodman, 2010, page.87)
For that reason this has bring at least 3 areas where the morality is apparently received or
obtained. First of all, morality can be viewed as relative to laws of given country, so what the
legislation specifies as correct, then is actually morally upright. Next, morality can be stated to
have recently been founded on religion in which the different religious affiliations acquire own
holy books through which members are begged in order to behave in specific way. Finally, it
does not take personal supply of ethics. This is exactly what has sparked lots of controversy
being subject to countless interpretation as well as understandings. Accordingly, this is exactly
what I believe brought on influential philosophers such as Goodman to spirited discussion that
there're some points, which are definitely wrong. From this point of view, this particular study
seeks to research the credits or difficulties Goodman shows in his statements
(Goodman, 2010, page.88)
Lenn Goodman arguments
In the argument, Goodman confirms the presence of four fundamental as well as universal things
that come under the class of incorrect and unacceptable acts within society-moral minima. The
first is genocide, which includes politically started famine and germ combat. Second is an act of
the terrorism, which also contains kidnapping and child work force especially as players. Next
category is actually polygamy that may be extensive to cover captivity and incest. A rape and
feminine genital mutilation will also be another category. (Goodman, 2010, page.89) In fact,
most of what he laid out in his arguments within the eyes of the civilized people is certainly acts

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
to refuse human beings the justification to a comfortable living and as such wrong. Therefore, we
guess that Goodman was very right to write down ills that change or can impact any community.
(Goodman, 2010, page.90)
Some of the Examples
Still his postulations never have been spared the crucial thoughts of the brains that usually
formulate questions to try and challenge facts. Due to the fact, we live in new world, where lots
of things is susceptible to varied understanding - theory of relativity, a few Goodman's ideas
extremely contradicts the customs, which have already been suitable in some communities. For
instance, through telling that polygamy is merely wrong is quite questionable. When it comes to
the Islamic society, their religion may permit a person to get 7 wives if he is able to provide the
basic specifications to all kids. Therefore, this time is dependent within the insight of the
individual contending by using it.
(Goodman, 2010, page.91)
Likewise, Goodman's assertion that woman genital cutting is incorrect and subject to varied
meaning depending on traditions as well as customs. As I am knowledgeable, especially in a few
uncultured societies in continents for example Africa, Female Vaginal cutting is considered like a
ritual of passage, which is deeply entrenched in to the traditions of this society. For that reason
regarding the ritual of passage as a wicked act is controversial, because it is susceptible to an
array of understanding.
Deciding whether there are such universal moral requirements
To sum up instances, there is not anything like common moral requirements. It is actually
exceedingly shocking to discover that even which behavior or action, that generally is wrong, has
been practiced anywhere else without having raising eyebrows. Allow us to take the case of
violence. Obviously, human being life is sacred; every person would like to live permanently.
However, think about the terrorism acts, which are completed by some Islamic extremists by the
name of pleasing spiritual obligation- holy Jihad

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
(Goodman, 2010, page.92)
The above mentioned discussion makes me deduce that it's difficult to have universal meaningful
minima. In just as much as I am attracted to follow my spirit and declare that Goodman said can
forever remain correct, objectivity forces me to simply accept the bitter undeniable fact that one
person can't state the rules of behavior for your world. Giving one individual the mandate to
make and sketch morals for your universe is similar to selling our rights towards the author.
Additionally, considering that nobody is 100% perfect, it's wrong as well as improper to stick in
wholeness to ideas of a single person without asking. For that reason relativity eventually haunts
the world as much as moral minima are worried. (Goodman, 2010, page.93)
References -
http://muse.jhu.edu/login?
auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/good_society/v019/19.1.goodman.html

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4