Access over 20 million homework & study documents

abnormal_psycholog3

Content type
User Generated
Type
Essay
Rating
Showing Page:
1/3
Abnormal Psychology
Classifying Abnormality Paper
Alycia Moss
PSY/410
September 7, 2011
Laurie Rhia
Classifying Abnormality Paper
Many efforts have been made to try to classify abnormal behavior, by utilizing some type of
diagnostic categorizing system. These efforts have progressed from methods that vaguely lists
disorders, to more thorough, modern methods, like DSM- IV- TR, this method lists numerous
amounts of different mental disorders. Psychopathology is the study of mental illness,
abnormal/maladaptive behavior. Psychopathology is a term commonly used in psychiatry
whereas pathology relates to disease progressions.
The standard classification system for psychopathology is the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual
(DSM-1). The DSM is a manual, published by the American Psychiatric Association, listing the
official diagnostic classifications of mental disorders. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DMS-1) is the official manual listing psychiatric and psychological disorders.
This manual was published by the American Psychiatric Association in 1952, takes its coding
scheme from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), which is a diagnostic manual for
all medical diseases. The DSM was commonly used by physicians/medical professionals,
insurance companies and many courts systems. Courts used the DSM to define and diagnose
mental disorders, and the diagnostics code that was attached to the case would regulate insurance
reimbursements for treating the individual.
The controversy amongst the DSM-1 and DSM-II was due to the United States being controlled
by Freud’s psychodynamic perspective, which focused on the origins of mental illness and the
unconscious mind, consequently it fixated on conditions of the unconscious struggles opposed to
conditions of observable signs in classifying mental disorders. The categories recorded in the
DSM-1 and DSM-II relied on theoretical psychodynamic concepts like, neurosis. Neurosis was
defined as a mental illness containing symptoms triggered by unconscious emotive struggles. As
you might guess, the reliability of the DSM-I and DSM-II systems tended to be
quite poor because of the vagueness of such categories (Beck et al., 1962; Tarter, Templer,
& Hardy, 1975). As a result of the controversy between DSM-1 and DSM-II, DSM-III was
published. The DSM-III was created with two goals in mind. One was improving the validity and
reliability of diagnostics classifications. The APA’s objective was to make diagnosing standards
in the manual simpler and as detailed as possible. The APA’s other goal was to make the

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/3
Diagnostic and Statistics Manual III not created on theoretical perspectives. In short, the authors
of the DSM-III hoped that creating a more detailed and purely descriptive diagnostic manual
would produce more reliable and valid diagnoses and reduce theoretical squabbling (APA,
1994).
The greatest advantage of the modern DSM approach has been the partial achievement
of its primary goalimproved reliability and validity of diagnoses of psychopathology
(APA, 2000). This proved to be greatly important since diagnostic systems appear to be
impractical without the proper data, research, validity and reliability and treatment in the
psychological field. Even though the reliability and validity of the modern DSM system still
leave much to be desired (Barron, 1998; Beutler & Malik, 2002; Hilsenroth et al., 2005;
Wakefield, 1992), the new system represents a milestone as the first diagnostic system for
psychopathology ever to approximate the goal of adequate reliability and validity. The second
advantage is that the DSM-III has improved medical professionals mindfulness of how important
the diagnosis really is. Even though the reliability and validity of the modern DSM system still
leave much to be desired (Barron, 1998; Beutler & Malik, 2002; Hilsenroth et al., 2005;
Wakefield, 1992), the new system represents a milestone as the first diagnostic system for
psychopathology ever to approximate the goal of adequate reliability and validity.
Many critics focus on what they see as the DSM’s failure to adequately achieve its own
primary goal of achieving acceptable reliability and validity (Beutler & Malik, 2002;
Kirk & Kutchins, 1994). Some critics even contend that the new system has actually
decreased the validity of diagnoses (Barron, 1998; Wakefield, 1992). The moderrn DSM has
been criticized for using the theoretical approach opposed to the atheoretical approach. The
theoretical approach tends to lean towards the biological perspective, but the writers of the
modern DSM claim that it was revised to be more atheoretical with diagnosis. Finally, the
current DSM system has been criticized for being culturally biased (Eriksen & Kress, 2005;
Rogler, 1993). Since psychopathology varies among different cultures and history, there is
always the risk of mistaking something abnormal when it is normal in someone’s culture or vice
versa. For example, anthropologists interested in psychopathology have pointed out that talking
to dead relatives is considered normal in many cultures, yet it could easily be misinterpreted as a
pathological psychotic hallucination by a clinician from a different cultural background (Liester,
1998). Because this concern was raised about the DSM-III (Kleinman, 1987, 1996), the DSMIV-
TR explicitly discusses cultural variations in psychopathology, with descriptions of
“culture-bound syndromes” and suggestions for helping clinicians consider cultural context when
making diagnoses (APA, 2000).
References
Hansell, J. & Damour, L. (2008). Abnormal psychology (2nd ed). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/3

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Abnormal Psychology Classifying Abnormality Paper Alycia Moss PSY/410 September 7, 2011 Laurie Rhia Classifying Abnormality Paper Many efforts have been made to try to classify abnormal behavior, by utilizing some type of diagnostic categorizing system. These efforts have progressed from methods that vaguely lists disorders, to more thorough, modern methods, like DSM- IV- TR, this method lists numerous amounts of different mental disorders. Psychopathology is the study of mental illness, abnormal/maladaptive behavior. Psychopathology is a term commonly used in psychiatry whereas pathology relates to disease progressions. The standard classification system for psychopathology is the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (DSM-1). The DSM is a manual, published by the American Psychiatric Association, listing the official diagnostic classifications of mental disorders. The Diagnostic a ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4