The assignment: Please watch any modern comedy, say starring Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, etc. and compare the comedic styles and lead characters of the modern picture to the Chaplin formula as seen in City Lights. You will want to particularly address the principles of pathos, save the cat, and the rule of three in your post.An explanation of pathos: The clear sign of pathos is an underdog going against the odds and fighting the good fight for a noble cause. “To save his mother’s house against the big bankers” or “win the girl away from the evil boyfriend” or even “save mankind from the deadly, all-powerful aliens” would be easy examples you see all the time. Because the goal is noble you root for that character and because they are less powerful than their adversaries you admire their courage. You follow them willingly and share their ups and downs; it is very effective as a movie technique.An explanation of save the cat: Save the cat is an EVENT that is separate from pathos. It does not have to be tied to the plot, it could just be a scene thrown in there solely for the purpose of making someone look like a good guy. It is a device intended to manipulate the viewer into liking and rooting for the lead character and it comes at the beginning of a movie almost always in the first ten minutes. Take minute five or so forward in Mr. Deeds where Adam Sandler does about every good deed imaginable except perhaps saving a cat. It has nothing to do with the plot of the movie, occurs in the first few minutes, and is solely intended as a device to get you to like his character and cheer for him as he embarks on his adventures.An explanation for the rule of three: First what the rule of three is NOT. It is not three buildings or the three statues in the beginning of City Lights. In comedy, it is a gag that is run three times for maximum effectiveness. Consider some of the comic relief moments in the Star Wars movies:The Millenium Falcon trying to jump into hyperspace three times and failing. First they're being pursued by a Star Destroyer away from Hoth; Han attempts to jump into hyperspace but nothing happens. Then, after leaving the asteroid field and having supposedly repaired the hyperdrive, they try again and again it fails. Later, with Lando now at the controls, and with the hyperdrive supposedly fixed by Lando's mechanics, they try for the THIRD time and it still fails to go into light speed because the Empire had deactivated it!C-3PO spelling out the ridiculous odds against whatever they trying to do. First he says that the odds of Han and Luke surviving a Hoth blizzard are 725 to 1. Then he says the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field are 3720 to 1. (Prompting Han to reply "Never tell me the odds!") Finally, he tries to tell Han the odds of surviving a direct assault on a Star Destroyer, but Leia interrupts and tells him to shut up and shuts him down.An example from the slapstick comedy Airplane! During the landing sequence, Dr. Rumack (Leslie Nielsen) steps into the cockpit three times and says "I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you" in exactly the same way: once as they begin the descent, once in the middle of the landing, and once after the plane is on the groundIt is used in drama as well all the time: In Pan’s Labyrinth there are three challenges, just as there are in Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade. In Run Lola Run there are three endings.In modern comedies with dialogue the rule of three shows up in verbal jokes. The system for using the rule of three here is to use the first two to set up a pattern and then use the third to throw in the twist punchline. Consider: In National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation Clark asks his cousin-in-law, Eddie, "Can I refill your eggnog for you? Get you something to eat? Drive you out into the middle of nowhere and leave you for dead?"The grading for this board is as follows: 6 points for your original thread that analyzes the three elements in a more modern movie and 4 points for your response post to another student's original movie post. Your follow up post should add at least one more item of analysis to the original post, such as another example of Save the Cat or Pathos or The Rule of Three.A few tips to make your first thread posts on comedy a little easier for everybody and that should also enhance your grade:1. Please post the title of your chosen movie in the thread post heading. It is difficult for everybody else to know what movie you are posting about if you do not do this. THERE IS ONLY ONE THREAD PER MOVIE - that means if somebody takes, say, Big Daddy with Sandler, then you may respond to that post in the thread but you cannot repeat the movie in another new thread. Thus, the first people to post get first choice of movie to analyze. 2. You are also asked to respond to ONE post thread about other movies by adding your own analysis. "Great choice, I loved that movie" is not college level analysis and is worth nothing. There is a minimum word count for all original posts of 125 words (about half a page). What you need to do is to add to the critical analysis done in the first and following posts by adding new insights of your own. What has been very popular and what I ask you to also do is to link a YouTube (or other) link that allows students to see what you are talking about.3. Within the discussion board you will see a sample original post. Be aware that you cannot use the same movies used in these examples for your posts.4. Remember that you will want to include examples from City Lights in your original post.

Please see attached document for instruction and details about the project.

Thread: James Fowler was an American theologian who was the professor of Theology and Human Development at Emory University. He has produced several pieces of literature illustrating his theory of faith development. This week, you will review an article that introduces his stages of faith in relation to the developmental concepts you have learned about in this course. Faith theorists recognize the complex interplay of factors that impact one’s faith development. Development of faith, like other aspects of human development, involves movement from one stage to another and is not always systematic or predictable. Individuals can reach chronologic and biological adulthood while reflecting structural stages of faith that are more indicative of early or middle childhood or adolescence. Spiritual nurturing and practice, combined with a person’s spiritual aptitude and discipline, impacts the pace and depth of faith development.After reading and reflecting on the article, develop your thread addressing these questions:What are your impressions of faith development in relation to an individual’s other developmental processes? Do you feel that there is interconnection, or do you oppose the idea that successful faith development requires successful development in other areas? Explain your answer using examples and support from the article and/or other sources of information.Using your personal experiences, briefly describe some of the most meaningful characteristics of your faith development process. If there were pivotal moments or notable influences, good and bad, mention the significance of those people or events. Only include the most relevant details. Make sure to relate your thread to elements of Fowler’s faith development theory and your specific experiences. 500–600 words