Access Millions of academic & study documents

Airline Case Study.edited

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Business
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/4
Running Head: AIRLINE CASE STUDY 1
Airline Case Study
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4
AIRLINE CASE STUDY 2
Airline Case Study
From Airliner Perspective
It is clear that the commission of Flight Company does not involve itself or intervene in
the airline operational issues according to Pushpalatha Subramaniam, the director in
charge of consumer affairs.
However, Malindo bears the responsibility of solving problems experienced by their
customers such as accommodation if necessary, food vouchers and alternative flights.
Upon committing to the flight company, passengers rights are well catered for by the
2016 consumer protection code as provided for by Malaysia aviation. This will call for
punitive action for employees who mistreat passengers such as the case of Mr. Tofayel.
At times, unexpected technical issues may arise, this is not for the case of Malindo alone
but also with other airlines, such technical issues may call for grounding the aircraft. But
in case of employee misconduct, necessary punitive steps are taken against the employee,
and the passenger is refunded in case of extra charge caused by the misconduct
Where a customer is not satisfied, they can file the dissatisfaction complain with
Malcolm in advance to avoid more loss and dissatisfaction.
It is the best interest of the airline commission to receive complaints from passengers for
a solution, and this would ensure continued food relationship between the airliner and its
customers as well as protecting its image in the market.
The airliner is aware of the employee's misconduct tendency and that every commitment
is employees to solve the issue, as at the time, a replacement has been done, and
passengers are now being handled well.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running Head: AIRLINE CASE STUDY Airline Case Study Student Name Institutional Affiliation 1 AIRLINE CASE STUDY 2 Airline Case Study From Airliner Perspective • It is clear that the commission of Flight Company does not involve itself or intervene in the airline operational issues according to Pushpalatha Subramaniam, the director in charge of consumer affairs. • However, Malindo bears the responsibility of solving problems experienced by their customers such as accommodation if necessary, food vouchers and alternative flights. • Upon committing to the flight company, passengers rights are well catered for by the 2016 consumer protection code as provided for by Malaysia aviation. This will call for punitive action for employees who mistreat passengers such as the case of Mr. Tofayel. • At times, unexpected technical issues may arise, this is not for the case of Malindo alone but also with other airlines, such technical issues may call for grounding the aircraft. But in case of employee misconduct, necessary punitive steps are taken against the employee, and the passenger is refunded in case of extra charge caused by the misconduct • Where a customer is not ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents