The Americans With Disabilities Act has generated considerable debate because of the perception that it is a program of entitlement. Discuss

First assignment !! You are going to create/develop a 8-10 slide PowerPoint presentation that is based on leadership in the Health management/leadership realm of things. You have free range on this assignment, I am more interested in your ability to create a winning environment! Please include a title slide and reference slide (at the end) for any outside information. You are required to have at least two (2) outside resources/references for this assignment. second assignment ) Write a 400 minimum word summary/essay about the video, as a representation of your personal thoughts.- Did you disagree with any part of the video? Why?- Did you agree about any part of the video? Why?- What was the most interesting thing said?https://youtu.be/lmyZMtPVodo

75 Multiple choice questionsMultiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet) Why focus attention on the constitutionality of arrests?1. The constitutionality of an arrest is critical in determining whether evidence seized in a. connection with the arrest is admissible in court. An innocent person may sue an officer or department if unlawfully detained.b. There is no recourse of an unlawful arrest.c. None of the aboved. The act of taking an individual into custody for the purpose of charging the person with a 2. criminal offense (or, in the case of a juvenile, a delinquent act) is referred to as a(n): stop.a. arrest.b. search.c. seizure.d. A(n) _________ is a brief nonconsensual encounter between a law enforcement officer and a 3. citizen that does not rise to the level of an arrest; it is the detention of a person by a law enforcement officer for the purpose of investigation. stopa. arrestb. searchc. seizured. In which key case did the Supreme Court define the meaning of arrest as more than restricting 4. a person’s movement? Davis v. Mississippia. Florida v. Royerb. Henry v. United Statesc. Terry v. Ohiod. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that stationhouse detentions require probable cause?5. Carroll v. United Statesa. Michigan v. Summersb. Florida v. Royer,c. Davis v. Mississippid. Unit 2 Examination 84 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System In determining if an arrest has occurred, the courts will weigh:6. the duration of a stop.a. the degree of the intrusion.b. officers’ intentions.c. all of the above.d. Emergency circumstances, including hot pursuit, the possibility of escape, or evanescent 7. evidence are examples of: crucial exceptions.a. exception clauses.b. exclusionary rules.c. exigent circumstances.d. Which of the following is NOT a type of exigency recognized by the courts that authorizes the 8. police to act without a warrant? Hot pursuita. Likelihood of escape or danger to others absent of hot pursuitb. Evanescent evidencec. Inconvenient to obtain a warrantd. Evanescent evidence refers to evidence that is likely to:9. be hidden.a. spoil.b. disappear.c. be transferred to another location.d. A warrantless search for evanescent evidence is permissible when:10. there is probable cause to believe that evidence will be destroyed, lost, or devalued.a. the procedures employed are reasonable.b. the exigency was not police-created.c. All of the aboved. The Supreme Court first permitted warrantless hot pursuit searches in:11. Chimel v. California.a. Sibron v. New York.b. Warden v. Hayden.c. Welsh v. Wisconsin.d. Unit 2 Examination 85 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System In which landmark case did the Supreme Court carve out the automobile exception to the 12. Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement? Carroll v. United Statesa. Cardwell v. Lewisb. California v. Carneyc. Thoraton v. United Statesd. Which of the following are considered restrictions on frisks?13. Frisks are to be nothing more than pat-downs of outer clothing.a. Frisks must be motivated by a desire to preserve officer safety.b. For an officer to legally seize an item during the course of a frisk, the item to be seized c. must be immediately apparent to the officer as contraband. All of the aboved. Which case found that officers can demand identification in certain situations?14. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevadaa. Chicago v. Moralesb. Kolender v. Lawsonc. Papachristou v. City of Jacksonvilled. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that police officers can stop and detain motorists in 15. their vehicles with "articulable and reasonable suspicion?" Terry v. Ohioa. Pennsylvania v. Mimmsb. Delaware v. Prousec. Maryland v. Buie d. The decision in Pennsylvania v. Mimms:16. allows officers to frisk suspects’ outer clothing.a. authorize the police to stop suspicious-looking individuals based on less than reasonable b. suspicion. allows an officer to demand identification from citizens. c. authorizes a police officer to order a driver out of a car.d. Unit 2 Examination 86 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System In which case did the Supreme Court hold that police officers, with reasonable suspicion, can 17. order drivers out of their cars? Terry v. Ohioa. Pennsylvania v. Mimmsb. Delaware v. Prousec. Maryland v. Buied. Stops and frisks are considered which type of acts?18. Necessarya. Advisoryb. Separatec. Independentd. Person inventories are sometimes called:19. armspan searches.a. custodial inventories.b. arrest inventories.c. search incident to arrest.d. In which case did the Supreme Court sanction fire inspections?20. Camara v. Municipal Courta. Michigan v. Tylerb. United States v. Ramseyc. Carroll v. United Statesd. The Supreme Court has authorized warrantless inspections of:21. firearms dealerships.a. vehicle junkyards.b. closely regulated businesses.c. all of the above.d. In which case did the Supreme Court sanction sobriety checkpoints?22. Carroll v. United Statesa. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitzb. Delaware v. Prousec. United States v. Villamonte-Marquezd. Unit 2 Examination 87 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System Which of the following is an unconstitutional checkpoint?23. Border checkpointa. Sobriety checkpointb. License and safety checkpointc. Suspicionless checkpoints for detecting illegal drugsd. In which case did the Supreme Court declare that checkpoints for the purpose of detecting 24. evidence of criminal activity are unconstitutional? Carroll v. United Statesa. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitzb. Delaware v. Prousec. City of Indianapolis v. Edmondd. A claim of racial profiling can be raised pursuant to:25. the Fourth Amendment.a. the Fifth Amendment.b. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.c. 42 U.S.C. Section 242.d. Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet) In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the prosecution "may not use statements, 1. whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant…"? Massiah v. United Statesa. Rochin v. Californiab. Miranda v. Arizonac. Kirby v. Illinoisd. Besides interrogation, which of the following is/are central element(s) of the Miranda approach 2. to confessions and interrogations? Custodya. General questioningb. Formal criminal proceedingsc. All of the aboved. Custody is defined by the Supreme Court as happening when:3. A person has been taken into "custody."a. A person has been formally arrested.b. A person has been deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.c. All of the aboved. Which of the following can be considered interrogation for Miranda purposes?4. Formal questioning.a. Functional equivalent of questioning.b. Asking a question that is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.c. All of the aboved. Which of the following is NOT an essential element of the Miranda warnings?5. "You have the right to remain silent."a. "You have the right to an attorney."b. "If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."c. "You have the right to stop answering questions at any time."d. Unit 3 Examination 133 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System What is the appropriate level of proof for showing a valid Miranda waiver?6. Proof beyond a reasonable doubta. Probable causeb. Preponderance of evidencec. Clear and convincing evidenced. When identification procedures violate constitutional provisions, the results from such 7. procedures cannot be considered: reliable.a. accurate.b. admissible in a criminal trial.c. All of the aboved. Which of the following helps ensure a reliable lineup?8. At least five people appear in the lineup.a. All persons in the lineup have the same physical characteristics.b. The suspect should be permitted to choose his or her place in line.c. All of the aboved. A photographic array consisting of one picture may be sanctioned if:9. the witness had ample time to view the suspect.a. the witness paid special attention to the suspect.b. the witness’s description is accurate.c. All of the aboved. What do show-ups consist of?10. The suspect and an eyewitnessa. At least five peopleb. The suspect and the suspect’s attorneyc. At least three peopled. Which of the following is always preferable to show-ups?11. Lineupsa. Single photographic identificationb. Video arraysc. In-court show-upsd. Unit 3 Examination 134 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System If an in-court identification is influenced by an out-of-court identification, it is called a(n):12. tainted identification.a. flawed identification.b. unreliable identification.c. improper identification.d. Which of the following is a method of pretrial release where the defendant promises to show up 13. when required, without having to pay money? Baila. Preventive detentionb. Release on own recognizancec. Absentee triald. For which of the following crimes would release on recognizance most likely be ordered?14. Murdersa. Rapesb. Robberiesc. Petty theftsd. Which of the following can be considered criteria for deciding whether pretrial release should 15. be granted? Flight riska. Dangerousnessb. Ability to payc. All of the aboved. In response to many defendants’ inability to post bail, professional ________________ have 16. stepped in. bankersa. loan officersb. bail bonds agents c. skip tracersd. Unit 3 Examination 135 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System Which of the following is NOT an appropriate consideration in setting bail?17. Potential dangerousness of alleged offendera. Offsetting court costsb. Risk of flightc. Financial statusd. Which of the following usually takes place after a pretrial release decision has been made?18. Initial appearancea. Bailb. Preliminary hearingc. All of the aboved. Which of the following is true about the preliminary hearing?19. The accused enjoys the right to counsel.a. The exclusionary rule does not technically apply in preliminary hearings.b. There is no constitutional right for the accused to cross-examine.c. All of the aboved. Which of the following is intended to prevent hasty, malicious, improvident, and oppressive 20. prosecutions? Triala. Pretrial release hearingb. Preliminary hearingc. Arraignmentd. When a prosecutor charges an individual simply because the individual is exercising his or her 21. constitutional rights, it is known as ___________________ prosecution. selectivea. vindictiveb. aggressivec. zealousd. In Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of:22. selective prosecution.a. charge joinder.b. grand jury behavior.c. prosecutorial immunity.d. Unit 3 Examination 136 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System When is the best time to resolve the question of whether joinder is appropriate?23. After the triala. Before the trialb. During the trialc. None of the aboved. Why may the defense argue against joinder?24. The jury may not consider the criminal acts separately.a. The jury may view all the evidence against the accused as inadequate.b. Only one criminal defense can be asserted.c. All of the aboved. The right to a grand jury can be found in which constitutional amendment?25. Fourtha. Fifthb. Sixthc. Fourteenthd Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet) Pleas bargaining includes charge bargaining, sentence bargaining, and _________________ 1. bargaining. numbera. countb. judgec. appeald. Sentence bargaining requires who to be involved?2. Prosecutora. Judgeb. Defense attorneyc. All of the aboved. Which of the following are acceptable plea bargains?3. A lighter sentencea. Certain probation conditionsb. Prosecutor’s decision not to prosecute under a habitual offender statutec. All of the aboved. Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court’s view on plea bargaining?4. The Court supports it unequivocally.a. The Court supports it but requires that certain procedures be followed.b. The Court disagrees with it.c. None of the aboved. Which of the following can be considered impermissible inducements by the prosecution?5. Prosecutor threatens the defendant with increased charges against a third partya. Prosecutor threatens the defendant with decreased charges against a third partyb. Prosecutor flagrantly deceives the defendantc. All of the aboved. Which of the following is a type of plea bargaining where the prosecutor offers a reduction in 6. the severity of the alleged crimes? Sentence bargaininga. Charge bargainingb. Indictment bargainingc. None of the aboved. Unit 4 Examination 170 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System Which of the following is a type of plea bargaining where the defendant agrees to plead guilty 7. in exchange for less serious consequences? Sentence bargaininga. Charge bargainingb. Indictment bargainingc. None of the aboved. Charge bargaining is usually carried out between whom?8. The judge and prosecutora. The judge and defenseb. The defense and the prosecutorc. None of the aboved. Which of the following are examples of ad hoc plea bargaining?9. Prosecutor offers reduction in sentencea. Prosecutor offers reduction in chargesb. Accused is required to accept extraordinary condition of probationc. All of the aboved. The right to an impartial jury stems from which constitutional amendment?10. Fiftha. Sixthb. Seventhc. Eighthd. The right to a jury trial applies in:11. noncriminal proceedings.a. civil proceedings.b. criminal cases in which the penalty for a single offense exceeds six months.c. all petty offenses.d. The United States Supreme Court has ruled what as the minimum number of jurors needed to 12. comply with constitutional requirements in a criminal case? 3a. 5b. 6c. 9d. Unit 4 Examination 171 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System For a waiver of a jury trial to be valid, it must be:13. express.a. intelligent.b. voluntary.c. All of the aboved. Most juries in criminal cases consist of how many members?14. 6a. 12b. 18c. 24d. How many stages are there to jury selection?15. Onea. Twob. Threec. Fourd. The list of potential jury members is known as the:16. jury pool.a. master jury wheel.b. jury list.c. All of the aboved. In most states potential jurors need to be:17. of a certain age.a. U.S. citizens.b. free of felony convictions.c. All of the aboved. Which of the following is a valid technique for challenging the composition of a jury?18. Equal protection challengea. Due process challengeb. Sixth Amendment challengec. All of the aboved. Unit 4 Examination 172 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System A jury that represents a "fair cross-section" of the community within the meaning of the Sixth 19. Amendment is one that does not exclude: racial minorities.a. women.b. distinctive groups.c. All of the aboved. In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court ruled that an analyst’s laboratory report 20. prepared for the prosecution was: admissible based on a well-established hearsay exception. a. testimonial, so the defendant should have been allowed to cross-examine the analyst. b. admissible because scientific reports are reliable. c. testimonial unless a testable sample of the material on which the report is based is made d. available to the defendant. Which constitutional amendment contains the double jeopardy clause?21. Fourtha. Fifthb. Sixthc. Fourteenthd. Double jeopardy occurs when, for the same offense, a person is:22. re-prosecuted after acquittal.a. re-prosecuted after conviction.b. subjected to separate punishments for the same offense.c. all of the above.d. In which case did the Supreme Court declare that protection against double jeopardy is a 23. fundamental right? Benton v. Marylanda. Gideon v. Wainwrightb. Kansas v. Hendricksc. Blockburger v. United Statesd. Unit 4 Examination 173 BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System Which of the following can be considered a separate sovereign for double jeopardy purposes?24. Cities a. Countiesb. Statesc. Different state appellate court districtsd. The constitutionally guaranteed protection against ________________ is designed to ensure 25. that a person who has been convicted or acquitted of a crime is not tried or punished for the same offense more than once. entrapmenta. self-incriminationb. double jeopardyc. None of the aboved