Access Millions of academic & study documents

Impact Of Deterrence Programs On At Risk Juveniles And Prevention Measures Final

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Business Law
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/31
Running Head: IMPACT OF DETERRENCE PROGRAM ON AT-RISK AND
PREVENTION MESURES 1
Impact of Deterrence Programs on At-Risk Juveniles and Prevention Measures
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/31
IMPACT OF DETERRENCE PROGRAM ON AT-RISK AND PREVENTION MESURES 2
Impact of Deterrence Programs on At-Risk Juveniles and Prevention Measures
Introduction and Thesis Statement
The risk that youths will get involved in violence or become victims of violence
varies according to different factors. That includes individual personality, family
characteristics, influences from schools and peers as well as the neighbouring environment.
The most potent determinants of individual violence are gender and age. Specifically, boys in
their late adolescence and young men have a higher likelihood of engaging in criminal
activity than girls. Besides, most juvenile homicide victims are acquaintances, strangers, and
family members. In 1995, 54% of homicide victims were acquaintances followed by
strangers and family members who were 36% and 10% respectively. In New York, 88% of
homicide victims were male by 1995 whereas 69% of offenders were between 16 and 17
years old. In Los Angeles, 92% of individuals designated by law enforcement as juvenile
offenders were male (Vries & Asscher, 2015).
Gatti and Vitaro(2014) asserted that Douglas neighborhood at the Southeast DC
was a high-risk zone for three nonfatal violent crimes. It was also a risk zone for rape and
pastings among youths in 1993 and juvenile robbery in 1994. Information gathered in DC
survey depicted that a small group offenders were responsible for 36% of criminal acts in the
region. Similarly, the small number of juveniles committed approximately 21% youth
assaults, 44% drug deals and 47% of all property offenses. A study in Los Angeles realized
that 30% of boys interviewed in a region that experience high-crime risks committed a
minimum of one in the last six months. The research paper, therefore, focuses on the impact
of deterrence programs on At-Risk juveniles and the way of preventing such impacts.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/31

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 31 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running Head: IMPACT OF DETERRENCE PROGRAM ON AT-RISK AND PREVENTION MESURES Impact of Deterrence Programs on At-Risk Juveniles and Prevention Measures Student’s Name Professor’s Name Institutional Affiliation Date 1 IMPACT OF DETERRENCE PROGRAM ON AT-RISK AND PREVENTION MESURES Impact of Deterrence Programs on At-Risk Juveniles and Prevention Measures Introduction and Thesis Statement The risk that youths will get involved in violence or become victims of violence varies according to different factors. That includes individual personality, family characteristics, influences from schools and peers as well as the neighbouring environment. The most potent determinants of individual violence are gender and age. Specifically, boys in their late adolescence and young men have a higher likelihood of engaging in criminal activity than girls. Besides, most juvenile homicide victims are acquaintances, strangers, and family members. In 1995, 54% of homicide victims were acquaintances followed by strangers and family members who were 36% and 10% respectively. In New York, 88% of homicide victims were male by 1995 whereas 69% of offenders were between 16 and 17 years old. In Los Angeles, 92% of individuals designated by law enforcement as juvenile offenders were male (Vries & Asscher, 2015). Gatti and Vitaro(2014) asserted that Douglas neighborhood at the Southeast DC was a high-risk zone for three nonfatal violent crimes. It was also a risk zone for rape and pastings among youth ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents