Access Millions of academic & study documents

Article Review For Management

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Management
Type
Homework
Showing Page:
1/3
Running head: MANAGEMENT ARTICLE REVIEW 1
Management Article review
Name
Institution

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/3
MANAGEMENT ARTICLE REVIEW 2
Management Article Review
he Topic of the article to be reviewed in this paper is "How CEOs became Takers and not
makers." Professor William Lazonick, the author of the article, claims that the business leaders in
US claim to be adding value to the society, economy and the shareholders yet they take the value
from them through share buy-backs. The main point of the article is a conflict of interest by the
senior executives of businesses. The intended audience for the article are the shareholders, the
corporate leaders, and the general public especially those who are interested in corporate
investments. The Arthur places some argument that supports the main point of the article. The
author says that CEOs conduct insider trading deals to benefit from the shares they hold for the
company.
The article explains how firms suffer from declining shareholders value, net
disinvestment, reduced capacity to innovate, job destruction, and workers exploitation, runaway
executive compensation, inequalities, economic stagnation and windfall gains for activist
investors. The author provides statistics as evidence and in support of the main point of the
article. Looking at the argument placed, my opinion is that the author's argument is logical.
Many firms have been experiencing failure due to the actions of the managers who tend to
pursue their interest and overlooks the interest of the shareholders. Share buybacks are only
justifiable when the share price is below the intrinsic value, and the business is in apposition to
buy the shares. There have been cases where the shares are bought back even when the price is
very high. The authors give an example that more than $2.4 trillion shares made through the
open market are executed when the share value is high. The CEOs buy the shares claiming that
they do not want to dilute the ownership of the business however that is not always the case. I,
therefore, agree with the findings of this article.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/3

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running head: MANAGEMENT ARTICLE REVIEW Management Article review Name Institution 1 MANAGEMENT ARTICLE REVIEW 2 Management Article Review he Topic of the article to be reviewed in this paper is "How CEOs became Takers and not makers." Professor William Lazonick, the author of the article, claims that the business leaders in US claim to be adding value to the society, economy and the shareholders yet they take the value from them through share buy-backs. The main point of the article is a conflict of interest by the senior executives of businesses. The intended audience for the article are the shareholders, the corporate leaders, and the general public especially those who are interested in corporate investments. The Arthur places some argument that supports the main point of the article. The author says that CEOs conduct insider trading deals to benefit from the shares they hold f ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents