Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Commercial Law

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Business
Type
Homework
Rating
Showing Page:
1/3
1
Running head: COMMERCIAL LAW
Commercial Law
Students Name
Institution

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/3
2
COMMERCIAL LAW
COMMERCIAL LAW
Question 1
After searching the Washington state UCC filings, there is evidence that there is a
security interest in the property and assets of Patit Creek Cellars that was granted to Banner bank
and Warden Hutterian Brethren.
Part (a)
If the secured party which is the Banner bank and Warden Hutterian Brethren did not
include the equipment that is owned by Patit Creek Cellars into the list of security interests, then
the organization can sell the barrels and equipment to Neo. Also if the loan secured by Patit
Creek Cellars was a general loan and was not specifically granted to purchase the barrels and
equipment, then they are eligible to sell them to Neo.
Part (b)
A purchase money security interest is a type of security interests that protect specific
loans granted to the debtor to specifically purchase a certain item. If the barrels and equipment
that were sold to Neo are protected within a purchase money security interest, then the secured
party has the right to repossess the items. If an original security interest did not include the
barrels and the equipment as collateral, a purchase money security interest that is imposed later
including the barrels is still considered valid.
Question 2
Part (a)
After conducting a search for the name “Trifecta Brews and more”, there was no other
registered business with the same name.
Part (b)
If Trifecta Restaurant is a registered trademark, the owner of the restaurant may file a
lawsuit that citing trademark dilution since both businesses share a common name. The owner of
the restaurant may argue that the inclusion of the word Trifecta to the liquor business will affect
the distinctiveness of the restaurant or affect its reputation. (Bently & Sherman, 2014).The owner
may also argue that the similarity in the names may create an unwanted association between the
two businesses. These arguments are protected by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006
which protect against trademark dilution which is part of trademark infringement and punishable
by law.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/3

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1 Running head: COMMERCIAL LAW Commercial Law Student’s Name Institution 2 COMMERCIAL LAW COMMERCIAL LAW Question 1 After searching the Washington state UCC filings, there is evidence that there is a security interest in the property and assets of Patit Creek Cellars that was granted to Banner bank and Warden Hutterian Brethren. Part (a) If the secured party which is the Banner bank and Warden Hutterian Brethren did not include the equipment that is owned by Patit Creek Cellars into the list of security interests, then the organization can sell the barrels and equipment to Neo. Also if the loan secured by Patit Creek Cellars was a general loan and was not specifically granted to purchase the barrels and equipment, then they are eligible to sell them to Neo. Part (b) A purchase money security interest is a type of security interests that protect specific loans granted to the debtor to ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4