Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Introduction to Taxation

Content type
User Generated
Type
Study Guide
Rating
Showing Page:
1/19
1
MARTHA ROSE C. SERRANO
I: TAXATION
1. Definition of Taxation
a. Taxation is the act of laying a tax. The process or means
by which the sovereign through its law making body
raises income to defray the necessary expenses of
government. It is merely a way of apportioning the cost
of government among those who is some measure are
privileged to enjoy its benefits and therefor must bear
its burden.
b. Inherent power of the state to demand enforced
contributions for public purpose or purposes.
2. Nature of Internal Revenue Laws
EMILIO Y. HILADO, PETITIONER, VS. THE COLLECTOR OF
INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE COURT OF
TAX APPEALS, RESPONDENTS; G.R. No. L-9408,
October 31, 1956; Bautista Angelo J
Facts:
On March 31, 1952, petitioner filed his income tax return for 1951 with
the treasurer of Bacolod City wherein he claimed, among other things,
the amount of P12, 837.65 as a deductible item from his gross income
pursuant to General Circular No. V-123 issued by the Collector of
Internal Revenue. On the basis of said return, an assessment notice
demanding the payment of P9, 419 was sent to petitioner, who paid the
tax in monthly installments, the last payment having been made on
January 2, 1953.
Meanwhile, on August 30, 1952, the Secretary of Finance, through the
Collector of Internal Revenue, issued General Circular No. V-139 which
not only revoked and declared voids his general Circular No. V-123 but
laid down the rule that losses of property which occurred during the
period of World War II from fires, storms, shipwreck or other casualty,
or from robbery, theft, or embezzlement are deductible in the year of
actual loss or destruction of said property. The deduction was
disallowed and the CIR demanded from him P3, 546 as deficiency
income tax for said year. The petition for reconsideration filed by
petitioner was denied so he filed a petition for review with the CTA.
The SC affirmed the assessment made by the CIR. Hence, this appeal.
Issue: 1. whether Hilado can claim compensation during the war; and
2. Whether the internal revenue laws can been enforced during
the war
Ruling:
1. No. Assuming that said amount represents a portion of the 75% of his
war damage claim which was not paid, the same would not be
deductible as a loss in 1951 because, according to petitioner, the last
installment he received from the War Damage Commission, together
with the notice that no further payment would be made on his claim,
was in 1950. In the circumstance, said amount would at most be a proper
deduction from his 1950 gross income. In the second place, said amount
cannot be considered as a "business asset" which can be deducted as a
loss in contemplation of law because its collection is not enforceable as a
matter of right, but is dependent merely upon the generosity and
magnanimity of the U. S. government. As of the end of 1945, there was
absolutely no law under which petitioner could claim compensation for
the destruction of his properties during the battle for the liberation of the
Philippines. And under the Philippine Rehabilitation Act of 1946, the
payments of claims by the War Damage Commission merely depended
upon its discretion to be exercised in the manner it may see lit, but the
non-payment of which cannot give rise to any enforceable right.
2. Yes. It is well known that our internal revenue laws are not political
in nature and as such were continued in force during the period of
enemy occupation and in effect were actually enforced by the occupation

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/19
2
government. As a matter of fact, income tax returns were filed during
that period and income tax payment were effected and considered valid
and legal. Such tax laws are deemed to be the laws of the occupied
territory and not of the occupying enemy
ISSUE
Whether the Secretary of Finance acted with valid authority in
revoking General Circular No. V-123 and approving in lieu thereof,
General Circular No. V-139.
HELD
Yes. The Secretary of Finance is vested with authority to revoke, repeal
or abrogate the acts or previous rulings of his predecessors in office
because the construction of a statute by those administering it is not
binding on their successors if the latter becomes satisfied that a different
construction should be given. General Circular No. V-123, having been
issued on a wrong construction by the law, cannot give rise to a vested
right that can be invoked by a taxpayer. A vested right cannot spring
from a wrong interpretation.
An administrative officer cannot change a law enacted by Congress.
Once a regulation which merely interprets a statute is determined
erroneous, it becomes a nullity. The CIR’s erroneous construction of the
law does not preclude or stop the Government from collecting a tax
legally due.
Under Art. 2254 of the Civil Code, no vested/acquired right can arise
from acts/omissions which are against the law or which infringe upon
the rights of others.
3. SCOPE OF TAXATION
a. Sec 28 Art 6 1987 Constitution
i. The rule of taxation shall be uniform and
equitable. The Congress shall evolve a progressive
system of taxation.
ii. The Congress may, by law, authorize the
President to fix within specified limits, and subject
to such limitations and restrictions as it may
impose, tariff rates, import and export quotas,
tonnage and wharfage dues, and other duties or
imposts within the framework of the national
development program of the Government.
iii. Charitable institutions, churches and personages
or convents appurtenant thereto, mosques, non-
profit cemeteries, and all lands, buildings, and
improvements, actually, directly, and exclusively
used for religious, charitable, or educational
purposes shall be exempt from taxation.
a. No law granting any tax exemption
shall be passed without the
concurrence of a majority of all the
Members of the Congress.
- The power of taxation is regarded as unlimited plenary and
supreme.
- The power may be exercised even to the point od destroying eh
commercial or use value of the thing taxed.
- The power to tax is an imperious necessity of all governments
and it not to be restricted by mere legal fictions.
- It is to inhere the obligation of a sovereign state to protect its
citizens.
- Personal property belonging to a foreign sovereign and
temporarily located in a particular country is not subject to state
taxation in hat country.
CHAMBER OF REAL ESTATE AND BUILDERS’ ASSOCIATION,
INC. VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY- MINIMUM CORPORATE
INCOME TAX

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/19

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 19 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
MARTHA ROSE C. SERRANO I: TAXATION 1. Definition of Taxation a. Taxation is the act of laying a tax. The process or means by which the sovereign through its law making body raises income to defray the necessary expenses of government. It is merely a way of apportioning the cost of government among those who is some measure are privileged to enjoy its benefits and therefor must bear its burden. b. Inherent power of the state to demand enforced contributions for public purpose or purposes. 2. Nature of Internal Revenue Laws EMILIO Y. HILADO, PETITIONER, VS. THE COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS, RESPONDENTS; G.R. No. L-9408, October 31, 1956; Bautista Angelo J Facts: On March 31, 1952, petitioner filed his income tax return for 1951 with the treasurer of Bacolod City wherein he claimed, among other things, the amount of P12, 837.65 as a deductible item from his gross income pursuant to General Circular No. V-123 issued by the Collector of Internal Revenue. On the basis of said return, an assessment notice demanding the payment of P9, 419 was sent to petitioner, who paid the tax in monthly installments, the last payment having been made on January 2, 1953. Meanwhile, on August 30, 1952, the Secretary of Finance, through the Collector of Internal Revenue, issued General Circular No. V-139 which not only revoked and declared voids his general Circular No. V-123 but ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Nice! Really impressed with the quality.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4