Your written assignment for this module should be a 1-2 page paper (not including title page and reference page) that describes the following:What are the different types of immunities and give an example of eachDescribe how stress impacts the immunity of a personYou should include a minimum of 3 scholarly references. Include a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page in APA format.

I need support with this Law question so I can learn better.Here is the question that was asked:In light of this century's development of modern electronic devices, do you think that the Fourth Amendment should be modified in terms of the search & seizure of electronic devices? If so, discuss what modifications you think should be made and why? If not, discuss why you do not think modifications need to be made and why. Are there any exceptions to the Fourth Amendment that may also be applicable? Be sure to use resources to substantiate your thoughts.After posting your original post, be sure to engage in discussion with your peers.————————————————————————————————————Respond to this post:The Fourth Amendment should be modified in terms of the search & seizure of electronic devices. In general, most warrantless private premises searches are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment unless a specific exception applies. It protects one of the United States citizens' fundamental rights (privacy) by defending people from unreasonable searches and seizures. However, predicting the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence's direction relating to this century's development of modern electronic devices is increasingly difficult because of the constant advancements in technology. As electronic devices become profound and convenient to use, people progressively rely on them to communicate with others via electronic mail, text message, and video conferencing. They also store their sensitive data such as pictures, health, and financial records. Hence, it's no surprise that a law enforcement search of an electronic device is now a routine part of any criminal investigation, regardless of how minor or severe the crime. I believe that privacy concerns must adapt to technological advances, and they must account for the ease with which information can be intercepted.Today, new technologies are a reality projecting us into a new era, and society must decide how to regulate their use, particularly concerning government surveillance. Traits unique to a digital world break down the distinctions on which the Court has traditionally relied to protect individual privacy concerning the Fourth Amendment. A typical example that proves the Fourth Amendment should be modified in terms of the search and seizure of electronic devices is the case of Riley v. California (2014), where the Supreme Court considered whether the 41-year-old search-incident-to-arrest exception to the warrant requirement applied to the contents of a cell phone in possession of an arrestee. As a category, modern cell phones implicate privacy concerns far beyond those involved by the search of a cigarette pack, a wallet, or a purse found in possession of an arrestee. Despite rapidly advancing technology, fundamental principles do not change. Some police agencies and investigators recognize the need to obtain a warrant for the search and seizure of electronic devices; many do not, which indicates that warrants are not being obtained consistently to implement surveillance of electronic devices. Technology does not give the government a license to surveil every move of its citizens; hence, modifying the Fourth Amendment in terms of the search & seizure of electronic devices will help control this problem.ReferencesThe Fourth Amendment and new technologies. (n.d.). The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/report/the-fourth-amendment-and-new-technologiesTelephone technology versus the Fourth Amendment. (n.d.). American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2016/spring/telephoneDigest comment - New technologies and the Fourth Amendment. (2009, December 29). Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/digest-comment-new-technologies-and-the-fourth-amendmentOriginalism, the Fourth Amendment, and new technology. (2020, January 10). Law & Liberty. https://lawliberty.org/originalism-the-fourth-amendment-and-new-technology/

Imagine that while you have been enrolled in this course, you have realized there are no sustainability initiatives at the company your work for. You mentioned your interest in implementing a sustainability initiative for the company, an initiative that demonstrates environmentally supportive practices that also make financial sense to the business. The Chief Executive Officer likes your idea, and she said that before creating a sustainability program at your company, it is important to understand the laws and regulations that will influence your company's sustainable practices. In order to do this, you are tasked with learning about various environmental laws and regulations and how they might be relevant to the company. Research the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, and 1 other law or regulation of your choice. The law or regulation you choose may be a local or state regulation, or another federal law or regulation. Write a 1- to 2-page email to the Director of Human Resources, the department that will ultimately implement the policy and program at the company, explaining the environmental regulations that you think should influence any sustainability practices your company might implement. Use the memn template provided. Describe the new initiative you suggest and the purpose of your email, briefly. Summarize the 3 laws and regulations you researched, including the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. For each law or regulation, include the title, a description of the law or regulation, and how environmental science influenced its development. For example, the EPA examined the environmental impacts of six main types of pollutants in stormwater runoff, including floatable debris that commonly includes plastic, as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System to permit requirements and stormwater control strategies.