Write a summary of a provided article. The paper should be in a way where non science students/scientists can understand it. How to write a good layperson translation paper from a peer-reviewed articleCommunicating science to a non-scientist can be difficult. The goal of this exercise is to get you to choose a paper from the peer-reviewed literature, on an approved topic in genetics, and translate this paper into an ~2 page paper in the style of a NY Times science times article, which could be read by anyone.The paper is attached.

 Borland Case Baseline Ethics Discussion  Resources OER Text: Human Relations Video: Our Buggy Moral Code   Background Information Borland's Brave Beginning Philipe Kahn, the colorful former CEO and current Chairman of Borland International built a powerful software company from the ground up with a series of brilliant business moves including the 1991 acquisition of Ashton-Tate, one of the software industries' biggest companies for $440 million. Until very recently, the company was extremely successful, culminating in the building a palatial headquarters complex costing nearly $100 million. At one point, Kahn even entertained thoughts of challenging Microsoft as the world's top software manufacturer. (1) While the company has recently fallen on hard times, its beginning is one that some would consider morally questionable while others would denote as being "smart moves within the game." In an interview with Inc. Magazine in 1989, Kahn told the story of Borland's humble beginnings. Operating out of two small rooms and strapped for cash, he couldn't afford to place an ad in Byte magazine, the best forum to reach his target market. In order to convince the ad salesman to extend credit terms, Kahn hired "extra people" to scurry around and made sure the phones were ringing in order to look busy. He prepared a media plan on a chart in which Byte was crossed out but made sure the salesman "accidentally" saw the chart. When the salesman asked if they wanted to advertise in Byte, Kahn replied that it was not the right audience and that they couldn't afford it. The salesman pleaded and eventually gave good terms of credit.  The ad ran once and sold $150,000 worth of software, launching a successful venture.(2) Pitta, Julie. "The Barbarian Steps Down."  Los Angeles Times.  January 12, 1995. p. D1+ "Managing by Necessity."  Inc.  March, 1989, pp. 33+ Instructions Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. Read 5.1: An Ethics framework from Chapter 5 of the Human Relations OER textbook. Read Borland’s Brave Beginning. Navigate to the threaded discussion and respond to the following prompts: Briefly summarize the Borland Case. Clearly identify and discuss each of the Four Levels of Ethical Issues from your reading in the Human Relations text that are present in the Borland case. In your analysis, be sure to discuss how the players, in this case, were impacted at each of the four levels. What do you think about Kahn’s actions? Do his actions amount to shrewd business, deception, or both? Some might argue that since everyone “won” in the end, Kahn’s decision was ethical. Do you agree? Why or why not? Review the Ted Talk Our Buggy Moral Code. What is a personal fudge factor? Does Kahn’s actions in the Borland case violate your personal fudge factor? Why or Why not? If you were Kahn, what might have been some ways to achieve the same outcome but in a more ethical manner? How do these approaches take into account the four levels of ethical issues from your reading?

This about a financial case. I have the answers, however, I need them paraphrased and to make it different from the original. (Just write the same answers in a different way with different use of word). Here are the questions:1. Why does Warren Buffett want to buy MEG’s newspaper division?2. Is MEG’s newspaper division worth $142 million? a. Start by valuing the newspaper division, assuming the cash flow forecast in Exhibit 10 is reasonable. For the purposes of this analysis, assume a market risk premium o f6%, a debt beta of 0.20, a closing date for the transaction of January 1, 2012 (you can ignore half-year discounting), and a reduction of $30 million in your valuation of the entire newspaper division to reflect the fact that the The Tampa Tribune is excluded from the purchase agreement. b. Are the cash flow forecasts reasonable? What are the critical assumptions you need to make for the newspaper division (again, lessThe Tampa Tribune) to be worth $142 million? To be worth more than $142 million?3. How much value, if any, does Buffett derive from the credit agreement?4. What should MEG’s CEO Marshall Morton do? What are his options?