Each weekly discussion should find an example from each assigned author of something that you feel is still relevant or at least resonant to the world we live in today. You will tell me what that example is, and then you will explain why it is still relevant or resonant. So, for this week, I should see1. An example from one of the Al-Shaykh stories assigned ("A Season of Madness" or "An Unreal Life") that is relevant or resonant to today.2. An example from one of the Hua stories assigned ("Boy in the Twilight" or "Victory") that is relevant or resonant to today.250 words minimum

Week 7 Advocacy Paper Choose a patient-care situation in which the RN should intervene and advocate for the patient. An example of such a situation might be when a patient has not been given complete informed consent. Include the following in your paper: Describe the clinical situation concisely and descriptively. It can be an actual situation or a hypothetical one. Apply the Bioethical Decision Making Model to the specific clinical ethical situation that you choose. Address each section of the model in your paper.(Attached is the Bioethical model)Conclude with a discussion of nursing advocacy in the clinical setting and the nurse’s role as a patient advocate. Your paper should be 4-5 pages. You must reference and cite 1-2 scholarly sources other than your text. Include a title page and a reference page to cite your text and adhere to APA formatting.

Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 1Final Project – ReferencesBenjamin Franklin once quoted, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.” This week’s written assignment is designed to ensure you stay on track with your final project and have adequately researched your organization of choice and planned intervention. For this week, provide a set of references you have read in preparation for your final project. Each reference should include the following: APA formatted citation of the source as it will appear on your References page A brief description of the source A short summary of its primary points or arguments A brief explanation of how the source is relevant to your project A minimum of 5 references is required for this assignment. Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.Organizational Behavior – Week #3 Assignment 2It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case StudyReview the It’s Just a Matter of Timing Case Study (pp. 133-134) and answer the three discussion questions. Responses to each question should range from 100-200 words. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1" margins, title and reference pages). Be sure to use the text and/or other sources to support your responses and properly cite the use of such.What did Teresa learn?Other than quitting, what can Teresa do to resolve the problem? What learning and perception factors should she consider as she analyzes the situation? If you were an outside consultant to the firm, could you recommend solutions that might not occur to Teresa or Vegas? What would they be? Exemplary 18-20 points Proficient 16-17 points Developing 14-15 points Beginning 12-13 points Inadequate 0-11 points Comprehension of Assignment (20% of grade) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. Addressed the majority of the question(s). Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). Did not address the question(s). Application of Course Knowledge and Content (20% of grade) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. Organization of Ideas (20% of grade) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. Writing Skills (20% of grade) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. Research Skills (20% of grade) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. No evidence of resources apparent.