Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Evaluating A Qualitative Research Article

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Health & Medical
Type
Homework
Rating
Showing Page:
1/8
Running head: EVALUATING A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE 1
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
Name
Institution
Instructor
Course

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/8
EVALUATING A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE 2
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
Evaluation of Credibility of Research Article Using Most of the Components
A critical analysis of the research article indicates that the author has ensured reliability
while writing the article. One aspect of credibility that has been observed relates to timeliness.
Concerning timeliness, the author has deployed resources which are recent to support the
actuality that daily life and women’s HRQOL are strongly influenced by the effect of the
vertebral fracture (Hallberg, Ek, Toss & Bachrach-Lindström, 2010). While augmenting
credibility, the authors have employed reliable resources. Most of these resources are peer
reviewed and have credentials such as the authors and the year of publishing. Ideally, there is
enough documentation which indicates that the article itself is reliable.
The authors have also identified the appropriate population for the current study. The
authors have specifically dedicated the message of vertebral fracture to women in various parts
of the world (Hallberg, Ek, Toss & Bachrach-Lindström, 2010). It is through this particular study
that they observed that the daily lives of women significantly affected the influence of the
vertebral fracture. Relevance is also an important aspect of credibility of a given research article
(Houser, 2018). In regards to this, it heeded that most of the resources that the authors have
employed in supporting the various arguments that they make are remarkably have an
association with the information that the author seeks to provide.
Evaluation of the Problem Statement and Research Design
A critical assessment of this particular study indicates that the problem statement is
articulated. The problem that is presented in this case is that vertebral fracture due to
osteoporosis is becoming common in developed countries (Hallberg, Ek, Toss & Bachrach-

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/8

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 8 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running head: EVALUATING A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article Name Institution Instructor Course 1 EVALUATING A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article Evaluation of Credibility of Research Article Using Most of the Components A critical analysis of the research article indicates that the author has ensured reliability while writing the article. One aspect of credibility that has been observed relates to timeliness. Concerning timeliness, the author has deployed resources which are recent to support the actuality that daily life and women’s HRQOL are strongly influenced by the effect of the vertebral fracture (Hallberg, Ek, Toss & Bachrach-Lindström, 2010). While augmenting credibility, the authors have employed reliable resources. Most of these resources are peer reviewed and have credentials such as the authors and the year of publishing. Ideally, there is enough documentation which indicates that the article itself is reliable. The authors have also identified the appropriate population for the current study. The authors have specifically dedicated the message of vertebral fracture to women in various parts of the world (Hallberg, Ek, Toss & Bachrach-Lindström, 2010). It is through this particular study that they observed that the daily lives of women significantly affected the influence of the vertebral fracture. Relevance is also an important aspect of credibility of a given research article (Hous ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Excellent resource! Really helped me get the gist of things.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents