1. "What should the teacher say or do in each of the following situations?"2. Economic Issues - Myths and Truths.3.Gender Identification Question

Week 2: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper This paper should integrate HP2020 and CDC information into your paper. Research Topic: Injury and Violence Prevention: Older Adult Abuse. References from less than 5 yearsIdentify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state. (State: FLORIDA)Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2020 for interventions. Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked.In a four (4) page paper, address the following. Refer to rubric for expanded details related to grading expectations.Identify the problem in the introduction section. Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national. Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk. HP2020: Present the goal, overview and objectives of Healthy People 2020 for the paper topic.Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2020 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies. Best Practices in Preparing the Project Review directions and rubric through carefully. Follow submission requirements.Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. Organize the paper using the rubric sections and appropriate headings to match the sections. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly. A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature references must be used. Not all references should be from scholarly web sites. You may use your textbook, but this will not count towards the three (3) scholarly literature references.Length: Papers not adhering to the page length may be returned to you for editing to meet the length guidelines. Adhere to the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic policy on integrity as it pertains to the submission of your own original work for assignments. Rubric NR503_HP2020_Sept19 NR503_HP2020_Sept19 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 100 Points Introduction of the Problem (no heading) 1. Problem is clearly stated. 2. General introduction to the problem supports its importance as a population health issue with data and general statement of scope of problem. 3. Focus of the paper is stated succinctly. (3 critical elements) 5.0 pts Excellent All bullet items (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation, by evidence. 4.0 pts V. Good All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element. 3.0 pts Satisfactory Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth 2.0 pts Needs Improvement Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Problem is unsupported 4. Writing is largely unsupported 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Section missing 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Overview, Background and Significance of the Problem 1. Provide background and significance of the problem. 2. This includes risks and impact of disease. 3. Data: State and National: Incidence, prevalence, mortality, breakdown by gender/race/religion as appropriately related (3 critical elements) 25.0 pts Excellent All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence. 23.0 pts V. Good All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element. 21.0 pts Satisfactory Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth 12.0 pts Needs Improvement Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Section missing 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEpidemiological Analysis of the Problem 1. Using descriptive epidemiology (provide description of term) analyze health problem 2. Include demographic and related epidemiological data 3. Include characteristics of at-risk population using HP2020 specified criteria (3 critical elements) 30.0 pts Excellent All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence 27.0 pts V. Good All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element. 25.0 pts Satisfactory Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth 15.0 pts Needs Improvement Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Section missing 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of HP 2020 1. Identify HP2020 goals and objectives 2. Relate HP2020 goals and objectives to health concern topic 3. Identify guidelines and a screening method related to health concern 4. Review validity (predictive power) of screening tool method to include what population the tool is applicable to use with (for instance, adult, child, culture) (4 critical elements) 20.0 pts Excellent All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence 18.0 pts V. Good All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element. 17.0 pts Satisfactory Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth 10.0 pts Needs Improvement Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Section missing 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation Level Planning Interventions 1. Investigate what is being done at the population health level related to prevention and health promotion for the health problem at the national and state level 2. Identify what and how outcomes are being tracked related to said interventions. 3. Utilize HP2020, CDC, state public health department, research, etc. as resources for interventions and data. (3 critical elements) 20.0 pts Excellent All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence 18.0 pts V. Good All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element. 17.0 pts Satisfactory Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth 10.0 pts Needs Improvement Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Section missing 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 25 Points APA 1. All content accurately utilizes APA format for citations and table formatting per APA current edition. 2. Reference list is formatted per APA current edition. Cover page, running heads, font size and type, reference list and headings per APA current ed. 15.0 pts Excellent No APA errors 14.0 pts V. Good 1-2 APA errors 12.0 pts Satisfactory 3-4 APA errors 8.0 pts Needs Improvement 5-6 APA errors 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory 7 or more APA errors 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling 1. Grammar, writing voice, and spelling are in accordance with APA 6th edition. 2. Scientific prose/voice is consistent. 3. Writing has precision and clarity 4. See APA 6th edition, 3, Writing Clearly and Concisely 10.0 pts Excellent Written work is free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. 9.0 pts V. Good Written work is largely free of grammatical, spelling or syntax errors.  (Approximately 1-2). 8.0 pts Satisfactory Written work includes some grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader. (Approximately 3-4). 5.0 pts Needs Improvement Written work contains numerous grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader (Approximately 5-6). 0.0 pts Unsatisfactory 7 or more errors 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. 0.0 pts Deduction of points 0.0 pts Deduction of points 0.0 pts Total Points: 125.0 PreviousNext

Behavior analysts have been conducting research on the effectiveness of behavioral management programs for many years. The purpose of this research is to provide evidence-based data to ensure the techniques used with clients are as effective as possible and that change is achieved, maintained, and generalized. Evidence-based research is useful because the data has been measured using scientific principles to ensure accuracy of the information.For this Discussion, you will examine the factors to evaluate when determining the effectiveness of a behavioral program. In addition, you will explore how paraprofessionals can contribute to the collection of data used in measuring effectiveness.Review the Learning Resources for this week. Pay close attention to the videos and the interactive media, “Recommended Practices for Individual Supervision of Aspiring Behavior Analysts.”By Day 4 of Week 1Post what factors you would need to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a behavioral program and why? What documentation might be important to demonstrate effectiveness of a behavioral program?