ONLY PICK THIS ASSIGNMENT IF YOU HAVE EXCESS TO THE BOOK NAME Environmental Ethics for Canadians (2016). Ed. Byron Williston. Second EditionI need 5 pages. 1 page for one question 1) When providing an elucidation of an article's argument, do not provide a sort of summary that is written in a kind of chronological sense. This is to say, do not write it as you might a book report. Instead, try to isolate the most pertinent concepts and claims and connect them together to produce an account of how the authors premises/reasons/claims are connected to produce a sub-conclusion/conclusion, or, where applicable, a series of sub-conclusions that lead to a final conclusion.2) While elucidating, identify potential counter-arguments that the author(s) anticipates and how those counter-arguments are addressed.3) Try as much as possible to put ideas/arguments into your own words in elucidating the article. If you are using the article's words, you MUST quote and cite appropriately.4) When creating arguments, try as much as possible to come up with these arguments on your own. You may borrow ideas here and there (and if so, cite), but overall, the arguments should be your own. Anyone can use google.5) When borrowing words and ideas, if the words are exact, they must be in quotes and a citation must follow every sentence with borrowed words. There should not just be one citation at the end of the argument/paragraph.6) When writing arguments, you must be as explicit as possible in outlining the reasons (premises) for your overall claim (argument). An argument is a set of reasons, connected (and explain how they are connected), that lead to a conclusion or final claim. Many of you left out parts of this recipe for an argument. An argument=series of premises, inferentially linked, which lead to a conclusion. By "inferentially linked", I mean you must explain, explicitly, how your premises lead to the conclusion you advance.7) Many of you write using unclear referents. If you see a comment to the effect of "ref?", this means that the marker cannot tell to what some word or concept you have written is referring. For instance, many of you write 'it', 'this', etc. in ways that leave it open as to what these words stand for or to what they refer.8) When producing arguments, consider a few possible objections and try to respond to them.9) When producing arguments, use analogies or examples to bolster your arguments.10) When I've indicated that you should advance arguments not already anticipated or addressed by the author(s) themselves, I really do mean it!