RequiredReview Chapter 2 in Fundamentals of ManagementChapter 6 in Fundamentals of Management RecommendedBur, M. (2016). Managing volunteers: making the most of their experience - and yours. NonProfit Pro, 14(9), 26-8. John, C. (n.d.). The difference between organizational culture and organizational structure. The Houston Chronicle. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-organizational-culture-organizational-structure-25206.htmlImportant! Read FirstChoose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.Option #1: Case Study Analysis: New Kind of StructureRead and respond to a case study to demonstrate your understanding of, and ability to apply, the concepts of organizational design and culture.Review a case study of Pfizer in the 10th edition of the course textbook attached in the Module 6 folder.Write an integrated essay that addresses the following items:Describe and evaluate how Pfizer is allowing employees to be more productive with its PfizerWorks.Analyze an organization where you work, or are familiar with, by considering the structural implications—good and bad—that the PfizerWorks approach would have in the specifics of productivity. (Address a minimum of one of the six organizational design elements in your analysis.Compare this arrangement with other types of organizations (including non-profit and volunteer, for example) and whether this structure would work.Discuss the global aspect of adapting a structure similar to Pfizer and how the culture of the organization may or may not be impacted.Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:Be 3-4 pages in length.Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. (Links to an external site.) Cite a minimum of three scholarly sources, at least one of which is not provided in, or linked from, the course. The CSU-Global Library is a great place to find these scholarly sources.Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which help both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.Business Management and Administration Library GuideA Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)Option #2: Case Study Analysis: Going to ExtremesRead and respond to a case study to demonstrate your understanding of, and ability to apply, the most important concepts of the module.Review a case study of Zappos in Chapter 2 of the course textbook attached in the Module 6 folder.Write an integrated essay that addresses the following items:Find a list of all 10 of Zappos’ corporate values. Pick two of the values and explain how you think those values would influence the way employees do their work.Explain which areas where Zappos’ culture is very high (or typical).Describe how did Zappos’ corporate culture began and how Zappos’ corporate culture is maintained.Discuss what other companies could learn from Tony Hsieh and Zappos’ experiences.Describe what could be improved in Zappos’ corporate culture.Your well-written proposal should meet the following requirements:Be 3-4 pages in length.Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).Cite a minimum of three scholarly sources, at least one of which is not provided in, or linked from, the course. The CSU-Global Library is a great place to find these scholarly sources.Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which help both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.Business Management and Administration Library GuideA Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)Rubric MGT300 Mod 6 CT MGT300 Mod 6 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper analyzes the new kind of structure case study and how structural implications can be good or bad for an organization or the paper analyzes the going to extremes case study elaborating on corporate values and culture. The paper includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and scholarly sources. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts with in-text citations to support answers. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical thinking. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical thinking. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis on structural implications in an organization or corporate values and culture in an organization. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 75.0