200 words or more Scenario: The environment continues to provide challenges to public safety professionals, yet the condition of the environment cannot be overlooked, especially when the long-term health of the planet depends upon purposeful and responsible action. For the purposes of this question, you are an independent evaluator hired by the U.S. Government to rate the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Question: Describe ways in which the EPA's approach to risk assessment for hazardous contaminants are similar to, and different from, the assessment of such natural (atmospheric) threats as hurricanes or tornados. How might they be similar/different in the scope, emphasis, and focus taken in defining threat levels and potential outcomes; and how might they be similar/different in the metrics used (standards for measuring, quantifying, and scaling degree of danger or potential harm)?

SCENARIOYou are the ethics officer of a marketing firm. The company prides itself on only engaging in ethical business practices. In order to ensure that all of its employees understand corporate ethical policy, new employees must attend an ethics training as part of the onboarding process. Additionally, every employee must attend an annual ethics training. These ethical training programs are developed by the marketing firm’s ethics officer (you), the marketing firm’s human resources (HR) director, and an outside consulting firm.In a joint development session, the team works through the training development materials that will be presented at this year’s two-day ethics training session. This year, the focus is on two primary topics: employees’ rights and responsibilities in the workplace and employer’s ethical responsibilities toward employees. In addition, hypothetical ethical scenarios are developed to evaluate the employees’ understanding of company ethical standards, general ethical decision-making, and desired courses of action.REQUIREMENTSYour submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.A. Take on the role of the ethics officer in the scenario and address the following:1. Describe three rights and responsibilities of employees based on the scenario.2. Evaluate two ethical responsibilities of the employer within the context of the employer/employee relationship described in the scenario.3. Develop one ethical business dilemma that can be used to demonstrate employee understanding of the company’s ethical standards.4. Evaluate the dilemma from part A3 from a utilitarian and relativistic perspective.5. Describe two common ethical decisions that reflect corporate ethics and responsibilities that employees can face while working in a corporate setting.Note: These should be different from the ethical business dilemma in part A3.6. Explain why each ethical decision in part A5 presents an ethical dilemma and how an individual might justify unethical behavior (e.g., common excuses).B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.