Access over 20 million homework & study documents

Case Brief Questions

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Law
School
Florida State University
Type
Homework
Rating
Showing Page:
1/6
1
Case Brief Questions
Student’s Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/6
2
Case Brief Questions
Abdul Razzaque Ahmed v. Kathleen Sebelius 710 F. Supp. 2d 167 United States District
Court, District of Massachusetts May 10, 2010
1. Why did Ahmed believe his billing privileges should not have been revoked?
The dispute arose from the revocation of Medicare billing privileges of the plaintiff,
Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D. The Department made this revocation of Health and Human
Services. On their part, they indicated that they did revoke these privileges on the account that
the plaintiff had been convicted of an offense under Federal law. The plaintiff had been charged
with fifteen counts, including mail fraud, health care fraud, and obstruction of criminal
investigations of health care offenses. Consequently, Ahmed was sentenced to two years on
probation and ordered to provide 400 hours of free medical care. After the sentencing, Ahmed
was served with a letter from National Heritage Insurance Co., which revoked his billing
privileges.
Ahmed filed the complaint indicating that his billing privileges ought not to have been
revoked. He indicated that the move by the Secretary to revoke his billing privileges went
contrary to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Ahmed believed that the Secretary ought to
have engaged in some revalidation process before the revocation. The other reason why Ahmed
was contending the revocation is based on the fact that due process was not followed in the
revocation process. He indicated that he ought to have been involved in explaining the actual
circumstances of the crimes he was alleged to have committed (Schubert, 2014). He contended
that this was a violation of his conditional right; hence the decision ought to be set aside through
judicial review.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/6

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 6 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
1 Case Brief Questions Student’s Name Institution Course Professor Date 2 Case Brief Questions Abdul Razzaque Ahmed v. Kathleen Sebelius 710 F. Supp. 2d 167 United States District Court, District of Massachusetts May 10, 2010 1. Why did Ahmed believe his billing privileges should not have been revoked? The dispute arose from the revocation of Medicare billing privileges of the plaintiff, Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D. The Department made this revocation of Health and Human Services. On their part, they indicated that they did revoke these privileges on the account that the plaintiff had been convicted of an offense under Federal law. The plaintiff had been charged with fifteen counts, including mail fraud, health care fraud, and obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses. Consequently, Ahmed was sentenced to two years on probation and ordered to provide 400 hours of free medical care. After the sentencing, Ahmed was served with a letter from National Heritage Insurance Co., which revoked his billing privileges. Ahmed filed the complaint indicating that his billing privileges ought not to have been revoked. He indicated that the move by the Secretary to revoke his billing privileges went contrary to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Ahmed believed that the Secretary ought to have engaged in some revalidation process before the revocation. The other reason why Ahmed was contending the revocation is based on the fact that due process was not follow ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents